Back

A Randomized, Controlled, Double Blind Clinical Study to Evaluate Use of Hydron Alkaline Ionised Water (HAIW) in Healthy Participants

Malhotra, V. K.; Tamoli, S.; Kalbhor, R.; Nipanikar, S.; Dubey, R.; Singhvi, R.; Sharma, S.

2026-06-22 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.06.17.26355908 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Objectives: Alkaline Ionized Water (AIW) is considered among the highest quality healthy drinking water worldwide and is widely discussed for its various health benefits. Hydron Alkaline Ionized Water (HAIW) is produced through electrolysis, resulting in a stable pH of approximately 9.5 with a negative Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP), making it an antioxidant beverage. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of HAIW and its effects on digestion, sleep, energy, and overall quality of life in healthy participants compared to Packaged Drinking Water (PDW). Materials and Methods: A randomized, controlled, double blind, prospective clinical study was conducted in which a total of 24 healthy participants between the age group of 21 to 40 years were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either HAIW Group or Packaged Drinking Water Group with equal gender distribution. Participants were hospitalized for 7 days and asked to consume at least 3 litres of the assigned water daily. Primary outcomes were safety-related laboratory parameters and adverse event monitoring. Secondary outcomes included assessment of digestion (appetite, digestion, bowel habits), urine parameters, sleep quality, freshness after waking, fatigue, energy/stamina/strength, quality of life, and global assessment Results: All 24 participants completed the study with no dropouts. Baseline demographics were comparable between the two groups. Assessment of primary safety-related laboratory parameters including Complete Blood count, liver function tests, renal function tests, blood sugar, Electrocardiogram and serum electrolytes showed non-significant change from baseline to 7 days and remained within normal limits in both groups, with non-significant difference between groups (p>0.05). HAIW showed significantly better improvement in appetite, digestion, and bowel habits from Day 2 onwards compared to Packaged drinking water. Sleep quality and freshness after waking up showed significant improvement from Day 3 and Day 2 respectively in the HAIW and PDW group, with significantly better improvement in HAIW group. Fatigue scores showed significant reduction at Day 6 and 7 in both groups with non-significant difference between groups. A total of 5 adverse events were reported (3 in HAIW, 2 in PDW), all unrelated to study products and were mild in nature. Global assessment showed excellent to good overall safety and tolerability in both groups. Conclusion: HAIW was well tolerated by all participants without any adverse effects. All laboratory safety parameters remained within normal range. HAIW demonstrated significant improvements in digestive function (appetite, digestion, bowel habits), sleep quality, and freshness after waking as compared to PDW. The study concludes that HAIW can be safely consumed. HAIW improves digestive and sleep-related functions.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
56.2%
50% of probability mass above
2
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.9%
4
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
5
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
6
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
7
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
9
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
10
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
11
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
12
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
13
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
14
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
16
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
19
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
20
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
21
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
23
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%