Back

Evidence of maternal resilience in two mouse strains in the context of permanent mouse breeding strategies

Leuthardt, A. S.; Calmbach, C.; Walo, K.; Prebianca, N.; Serra, G.; Botter, S. M.; Palme, R.; Jirkof, P.; Tarigan, B.; Boyle, C. N.

2026-06-21 physiology
10.64898/2026.06.15.731812 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Breeding female mice represent an essential but often overlooked workforce sustaining biomedical research. Despite their central role, the physiological and behavioral consequences of repeated reproductive cycles have been poorly characterized, in part because breeding animals fall outside the primary focus of laboratory animal welfare efforts, and in part because meaningful welfare readouts for laboratory rodents remain an active area of research. Here we report findings from an exploratory phenotypic study designed to capture a composite picture of maternal health in female mice of two commonly used inbred strains, BALB/cByJ and C57BL/6J, exposed to one, two, or four consecutive cycles of pregnancy and lactation, with age-matched virgin females as controls. Assessments were conducted during the final lactation period and in the five weeks following weaning, spanning behavioral, metabolic, and physiological readouts selected for their known sensitivity to reproductive or environmental challenge. Repeated reproduction altered maternal physiology, most clearly in bone microstructure, which showed progressive and dose-dependent changes across parity levels, and more subtly in body mass, energy balance, and glucose homeostasis. Behavioral readouts of maternal motivation, by contrast, remained largely stable across reproductive load. Strain differences were pervasive, underscoring that reproductive adaptation is not uniform across standard laboratory models and cautioning against generalizing from a single strain. Together, the data suggest that mouse dams demonstrate considerable resilience under intensive breeding conditions, while also highlighting that breeding shapes the maternal body in ways that accumulate across reproductive cycles and deserve greater scientific attention.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hormones and Behavior
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.5%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.7%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
6
American Journal of Primatology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biology of Reproduction
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.5%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.2%
10
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
11
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
116 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.5%
15
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
16
Neurobiology of Stress
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Genes, Brain and Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Developmental Psychobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
19
Endocrinology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Journal of Neuroscience Research
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
Acta Physiologica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%