Back

Physiological Aging of the Respiratory System (PARS): from development to application

Edakalavan, S.; Bon, J.; Nouraie, S. M.

2026-06-16 respiratory medicine
10.64898/2026.06.15.26355186 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Aging has a critical role in lung changes and the outcome of lung disease. Several lung aging equations have been proposed to measure deviation from physiological aging of the respiratory system. In this study, we aimed to develop a single measure of accelerated lung aging and show its application as a measure of lung aging. Method: We used a pre-bronchodilator pulmonary function test (PFT) from NHANES adult participants recruited from 2007 to 2011. We applied Klemera-Dubal Method (KDM) to four PFT measurements, FEV1, FVC, FEF25-75, and PEF, to calculate a measure of lung biological aging. Physiological Aging of the Respiratory System (PARS) was calculated from the residual method vs. chronological age. We tested the construct validity of PARS by measuring its association with risk factors of lung health. The prognostic validity was measured using a survival analysis. Sampling weights were applied to all analyses. Results: In 14,123 adult participants, the mean (SD) of accelerated lung age (PARS) was 0 (8.2) years. Participants with a history of asthma and emphysema had 4- and 10-year higher PARS. Cigarette smoking, lower socioeconomic status, black race, higher serum cadmium, and lower serum selenium and magnesium were associated with higher PARS. During 116 months of follow-up, PARS was associated with a higher mortality (HR = 1.06, 95%CI: 1.05-1.07 per year). Females with higher PARS had a higher risk of death (P for interaction < 0.001). Results were consistent across different subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: PARS is a noninvasive lung aging marker and can be applied as a single measure of lung accelerated aging in the adult population. Its strong construct and predictive validity support its future application among different populations with and without lung disease.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ERJ Open Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.3%
2
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.3%
8
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
9
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
10
Nature Aging
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
11
Respiratory Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
12
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.4%
16
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
19
CHEST
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
21
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Biogerontology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
Experimental Gerontology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%