Back

Scalable estimation of temporal clustering in accelerometry: a kernel-independent dispersion index grounded in the Hawkes process

Zheng, X.; Danilevicz, I. M.; Paw, M.

2026-06-15 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.06.14.26355611 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Self-exciting (Hawkes) point processes are a natural model for the temporal clustering of human physical activity (PA) recorded by accelerometers, yet they have seldom been used in this setting---in part because the usual maximum-likelihood fitting is challenging due to potential estimation bias and convergence failures on these data. A moment-based alternative---estimating the Hawkes branching ratio from the dispersion index, the variance-to-mean ratio of event counts---is kernel-independent and computationally trivial, but it has not been evaluated for accelerometry or adapted to the intensity-marked recordings accelerometers provide. Methods. Treating each minute above a sedentary threshold as an event, we estimated the Hawkes branching ratio $n$ by maximum likelihood and, as a kernel-independent and far cheaper alternative, from the dispersion index. We compared four dispersion-based estimators---event-count-based, intensity-mark-weighted using the mark-moment ratio, and time-of-day (TOD) adjusted variants of each---against the marked and unmarked maximum-likelihood estimates. Estimators were evaluated for mutual agreement, goodness of fit, and finite-window results in two National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) accelerometry cohorts (hip-worn, $n=2{,}560$; wrist-worn, $n=3{,}132$). We related the resulting temporal clustering measures to all-cause mortality using survey-weighted Cox models, adjusting for PA frequency, Peak30 (the average of the 30 highest PA values), and demographic covariates. Results. Event-count-based dispersion estimates agreed strongly with maximum-likelihood branching ratios ($r\approx0.74$ in both cohorts); the intensity-marked variant incorporating PA intensity variability agreed less well. Marked and unmarked Hawkes models yielded similar excitation and decay parameters, suggesting PA intensity added little clustering information beyond event timing. In the survival analysis, temporal clustering was associated with all-cause mortality independently of PA frequency and Peak30; the direction of association differed between the hip- and wrist-worn cohorts. Conclusions. A scalable dispersion-index estimator recovers the Hawkes branching ratio and matches maximum-likelihood estimates without requiring kernel specification or iterative optimization. It offers a practical tool for quantifying temporal clustering in accelerometry, enabling decomposition of temporal PA patterns into its exogenous initiation and endogenous persistence. Such temporal patterns carry health-relevant information beyond PA intensity and volume. Keywords: dispersion index; Hawkes process; branching ratio; temporal clustering; point process estimation; accelerometry; mortality

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.0%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.4%
4
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
5
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.4%
6
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
International Journal of Obesity
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.8%
9
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
12
Genetic Epidemiology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.2%
14
Statistics in Medicine
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
15
Biometrics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.5%
18
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
19
European Journal of Epidemiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Epidemiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%