Back

Intra-Complex Differential Transcription Strategies for Scaffold versus Effector Proteins

Tian, S.;Zhao, Z.;Kassie, M.;Annan, E.;Zhang, F.;Zong, C.;Ren, B.;Wang, D.

2026-06-16 Systems Biology
10.64898/2026.06.12.731977 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Scaffold-organized multi-protein complexes are major drivers of cellular regulatory pathways, but how the expression of their constituent genes is coordinated to support efficient assembly and cell-to-cell homeostasis remains poorly understood. Using snapTotal-seq data, this study addresses this issue at the transcription level through comparative analyses of stochastic transcription bursting - a major driver of expression level and primary source of its intrinsic cell-to-cell noise. We compared scaffold proteins and their effector partners in major regulatory multi-protein complexes: TNRC6A/B/C (in the miRISC complex) and CNOT1/2 (in the CCR4-NOT complex) in mRNA regulation; and AXIN1, APC, KSR2, AKAPs, DLG1, PATJ, HOMER1/2, and SQSTM1 in signal transduction. Our analyses reveal a shared strategy: compared to genes for active effector partner proteins and the general transcriptome, genes for structural scaffold proteins consistently utilize more frequent and smaller-sized bursting to achieve the fine tuning of a homeostatic expression level. This finding establishes a fundamental link between a proteins physical role within a regulatory complex and the transcriptional bursting kinetics of its gene.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.