Back

Machine learning surrogate forward models for biomechanical laryngeal control

Parra Pena, J. A.; Sorolla, C.; Quinteros Veas, N. F.; Ibarra, E. J.; Alzamendi, G. A.; Peterson, S. D.; Weerathunge, H. R.; Guenther, F. H.; Zanartu, M.

2026-06-16 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.12.731734 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate modeling of laryngeal motor control is key to understanding typical and disordered voice production. However, traditional biomechanical plant models based on ordinary differential equations (ODEs) often involve high computational costs and numerical instabilities, limiting their use in real-time closed-loop control frameworks. This study evaluates feature-driven machine learning (ML) regressors, specifically Random Forest (RF), Multilayer Perceptron Neural Networks (NN), and Polynomial Regression (PR), as surrogate forward models mapping laryngeal motor inputs to fundamental frequency and sound pressure level. Training data were generated with two biomechanical vocal fold models: the extended body-cover and the triangular body-cover. Results demonstrate that ML surrogates reduce execution times from seconds to milliseconds (e.g., 2 ms for PR), enabling stable real-time tracking via inverse Jacobian control. While RF provides the highest accuracy, NN and PR offer smoother control signals and smaller memory footprints. A practical performance threshold was identified near N = 1,000 training samples, below which accuracy degraded substantially when models were trained from scratch. These findings support ML surrogates as efficient and adaptable alternatives to direct numerical simulation, providing a foundation for future subject-specific modeling through transfer learning in data-limited clinical scenarios.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
15.0%
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.7%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.2%
4
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
7
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
IFAC-PapersOnLine
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
11
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
ERJ Open Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
19
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
20
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
21
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.1%
24
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%