Back

Population-Scale, Genotype-First Characterization of Monogenic Diabetes in 374,973 Multi-Ancestry Individuals from the All of Us Research Program

Hasebe, M.; Yoshiji, S.

2026-06-22 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.06.12.26355541 medRxiv
Show abstract

OBJECTIVE To characterize the prevalence and penetrance of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) in a multi-ancestry population using a genotype-first design. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We analyzed whole-genome sequencing and clinical data from 374,973 unrelated All of Us participants (42.0% non-European ancestry). We identified pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in 10 established MODY genes and assessed carrier prevalence, diabetes penetrance, and glycemic profiles. We evaluated age-dependent diabetes risk by comparing carriers with non-carriers stratified by type 2 diabetes polygenic risk score (T2D PRS). RESULTS We identified 370 carriers of P/LP MODY gene variants (0.099%; 1 in 1,013), with similar carrier prevalence among European- and African-ancestry participants (0.105% in both groups). Diabetes penetrance was incomplete (13.4% by age 40; 43.5% by age 60) and varied by etiology: highest for GCK (56.0% by age 60), intermediate for HNF genes (HNF1A/HNF1B/HNF4A; 45.4%), and lowest for non-GCK/HNF genes (ABCC8/INS/KCNJ11/NEUROD1/PDX1/RFX6; 29.0%). In multivariable Cox models using non-carriers in the middle 80% of the T2D PRS as the reference, non-GCK/HNF gene variant carriers had modestly increased diabetes risk (HR, 1.57), similar to non-carriers in the top 10% of T2D PRS (HR, 1.64). These associations were observed in both European- and non-European-ancestry individuals. HbA1c profiles differed by etiology, with stable mild hyperglycemia in GCK variant carriers and greater variability among HNF and non-GCK/HNF gene variant carriers. CONCLUSIONS MODY gene variants showed incomplete, etiology-dependent penetrance across ancestries. Carriers of P/LP variants in lower-penetrance genes had diabetes risk comparable to that of non-carriers with high polygenic susceptibility.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diabetes Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.1%
2
Diabetologia
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
Diabetes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
4
Genetics in Medicine
78 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
5
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
6
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
7
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
9
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Genetics in Medicine Open
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Human Molecular Genetics
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
17
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
22 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
20
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
Molecular Metabolism
112 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%
23
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%