Back

Food Colorings in Child-Targeted Ultra-Processed Foods in Brazil: Market Prevalence and Parental Perceptions

Silva Nunes, B.; Pereira Eberle, M. F.; F. Grilo, M.; Zancheta, C.; C. Sylvetsky, A.; Duran, A. C.

2026-06-23 nutrition
10.64898/2026.06.12.26355247 medRxiv
Show abstract

Child-targeted marketing on packaged foods can shape children's food preferences and parents' purchasing decisions, yet many products with child-targeted marketing are ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and contain cosmetic additives such as food colorings, which have raised concerns about adverse effects on children's health and behavior. This mixed-methods study examined the prevalence of food colorings in child-directed UPFs and explored parents' perceptions and knowledge of these additives in beverages commonly consumed by children. Quantitative data were obtained from the Mintel Global New Products Database to identify child-directed products launched in Brazil between 2018 and 2021, measured as having at least one child-targeted marketing strategy in the food package, and whether they contained food colorings. Qualitative data came from seven focus groups with parents of children aged 2-5 and 6-11 years in Brazil, alongside a brief survey assessing participants' ability to identify food colorings on product labels. Among 5,078 UPFs launched during the study period, 23.0% contained child-targeted marketing, and 40.3% of these had food colorings. The highest prevalence was observed in carbonated beverages, candies, and ice creams, in which more than half of products contained food colorings. Parents generally understood that food colorings are used to make products more attractive to children and associated them with potential health risks, but reported difficulties avoiding them. These findings highlight the widespread presence of food colorings in child-targeted UPFs in Brazil and underscore the need for stronger regulatory measures to restrict the use of food colorings and improve labelling on food packages.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
2
Frontiers in Nutrition
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
3
Public Health Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.2%
4
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Food & Function
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.3%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
11
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
13
Appetite
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
14
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
The Journal of Nutrition
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.5%
17
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
19
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Food Chemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
24
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.6%