Back

Bi-level inverse optimal control for preoperative prediction of postoperative squat kinematics after total knee replacement

Song, H.

2026-06-15 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.11.731549 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Total knee replacement restores mobility in patients with advanced osteoarthritis, yet many individuals still experience limited ability to perform high-flexion tasks such as squatting. Current preoperative planning relies on static imaging and cannot predict how different implant alignment choices will affect postoperative dynamic function. This study developed a predictive simulation framework that uses bi-level inverse optimal control to link preoperative implant alignment directly to expected postoperative squat kinematics. Subject-specific musculoskeletal models were constructed for six total knee replacement patients using experimental squat data. Bi-level inverse optimal control was applied to identify both individualised and group-level cost functions. The individualised setting provided subject-specific accuracy, while the group-level setting derived a single group-level cost function as an initial step toward preoperative use without requiring postoperative motion data. The individualised setting reproduced experimental trajectories with low errors across all joints (mean apex difference 1.53{degrees}, root-mean-square error 5.15{degrees}, normalised root-mean-square error 11.15%, Pearson correlation 0.96). The group-level setting yielded higher but acceptable errors (mean apex difference 5.70{degrees}, root-mean-square error 6.75{degrees}, normalised root-mean-square error 17.53%, Pearson correlation 0.95) while preserving the general pattern and phasing of the motion. Squat depth emerged naturally from the optimisation rather than being prescribed. This framework may provide a basis for future quantitative tools to evaluate how implant alignment choices influence postoperative squat performance, potentially improving functional outcomes in total knee replacement. These results suggest that the proposed IOC framework can reproduce key features of post-TKR squat kinematics, but further out-of-sample validation is required before it can be used for preoperative prediction or translated into tools aimed at improving functional outcomes in total knee replacement.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.6%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
3
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
4
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.0%
5
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
6
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.9%
8
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
9
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.3%
11
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
12
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
13
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
14
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
15
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
16
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
17
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
18
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
19
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
20
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Gait & Posture
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
23
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
24
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%