A global cross-sectional survey of health professionals' interest-confidence gaps in value-based health care implementation: a learning needs assessment
Lewis, S.; Andrews, A.; Laing, H.
Show abstract
Abstract Objectives Value-Based Health Care (VBHC) increasingly guides health system redesign internationally. Despite the increasing availability of VBHC education, gaps remain between health professionals' conceptual understanding of VBHC and their confidence to implement it in practice. This study assessed perceived learning needs and preferences of healthcare professionals across foundational topics essential to VBHC implementation. Design Cross-sectional online survey study Setting and participants The survey was distributed to the global VBHC community and yielded 518 responses. Most respondents were based in the UK and Ireland (51%) and 65% had more than 10 years of experience in the health sector. Participants represented a variety of professional backgrounds, including clinicians (34%), operational or executive managers and leaders (22%), and life sciences or procurement professionals (13%). Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome measures included self-reported interest and confidence across 15 VBHC domains and the magnitude of the gap between them. Secondary outcomes included perceived implementation challenges and preferred VBHC learning approaches, including prior engagement with VBHC-related learning. Results Respondents identified substantial VBHC implementation challenges, including implementing outcome measurement (62.4%), conflicting priorities (57.7%), and resistance to change (56.8%). Interest in all VBHC domains was high (median >= 80/10), while confidence to implement remained substantially lower across most domains (median <=50/100). The largest interest-confidence gaps were observed for reimbursement mechanisms, costing methodology, and overcoming implementation challenges. Interactive learning approaches, including in-person seminars/workshops (55.2%) and online masterclasses (53.9%) were preferred over self-directed formats. Conclusions This international survey identified consistent gaps between health professionals' interest in VBHC and their confidence to implement key VBHC domains in practice. Addressing these gaps through advanced, targeted and contextual education may support more effective and sustainable VBHC implementation in practice.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 96%
- A conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behavior: results from a qualitative study in southwestern Uganda 94%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Participant perceptions of disability training for health workers: a qualitative study in Ghana 94%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 93%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 95%
- The experiences, challenges, and enablers for promoting interprofessional education among medical students: A Scoping Review 95%
- “Endless Opportunities”: A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers to scale-up of two-way texting follow-up after voluntary medical male circumcision in Zimbabwe 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 93%
- Cross-sector Decision Landscape in Response to COVID-19: A Qualitative Analysis of North Carolina Decision-Makers 93%
- Healthcare workers’ perceptions and medically approved COVID-19 infection risk: understanding the mental health dimension of the pandemic. A German hospital case study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Development of the Kunonga Framework for Extending Approaches in Health Inequality and Inequity Evidence Syntheses 93%
- How, why and when are delayed (back-up) antibiotic prescriptions used in primary care? A realist review integrating concepts of uncertainty in healthcare 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.