Back

Three-dimensional imaging reveals preserved intrinsic contractile function in aging human skeletal muscle fibers

Zepeda, C. S.; Teigen, L. E.; Dobrzycki, I.; Wen, Y.; Sundberg, C. W.

2026-06-12 physiology
10.64898/2026.06.09.730973 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Age-related reductions in muscle fiber size and contractile function, particularly in fibers expressing fast myosin heavy chains, contribute to declines in whole-muscle power. However, methodological limitations in estimating fiber size during contractile experiments have likely contributed to conflicting findings regarding whether reduced single-fiber force and power in older adults reflects their smaller size and/or impaired intrinsic contractile function. To address this, we coupled single-fiber contractile experiments with 3D-imaging in 7 young (19-40yrs) and 6 older (69-84yrs) males to assess intrinsic contractile function and compare agreement between 3D-derived cross-sectional area (CSA) and CSA estimates obtained either in air or solution. Fast fiber CSA from older males were [~]28-45% smaller across measurement conditions compared with young, whereas slow fiber CSA did not differ. Accordingly, absolute force and power of fast fibers were 41% and 37% lower. When normalized to CSA from measurements in air or 3D-imaging, size-specific force and power either did not differ or were greater in older adults, indicating preserved intrinsic contractile function in both fiber types. This was supported by no age-related differences in the rate of tension redevelopment (ktr), a size-independent measure of intrinsic contractile function. In contrast, size-specific force and power calculated using solution-based CSA estimates were lower in older compared with young adults, and Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated the poorest agreement between solution-based and 3D CSA measurements. These findings indicate that intrinsic contractile function is preserved with aging and suggest that methodological differences in CSA measurement contributes to the disparate findings in the literature.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
2
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
3
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.6%
4
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
5
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.4%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Aging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
8
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
9
Experimental Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
10
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
11
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
12
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
13
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
16
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
17
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Experimental Gerontology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
FEBS Open Bio
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
Skeletal Muscle
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Neurobiology of Aging
107 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
23
European Journal of Applied Physiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%