A risk-of-contagion index using a Bayesian based model for the COVID-19 epidemic in Mexico
Corona-Moreno, R.; Acuna-Zegarra, M. A.; Santana-Cibrian, M.; Velasco-Hernandez, J. X.
Show abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, limited testing capacity and reporting delays complicated epidemic surveillance and decision-making in Mexico. We calibrated \textit{covidestim}, a Bayesian nowcasting model, to estimate the total SARS-CoV-2 infections from reported cases and deaths using Mexican surveillance data. Disease-progression distribution priors were calibrated using Mexico City records and validated through comparisons with national seroprevalence surveys, hospitalization data, and annual reported severe-case rates across all states. Using the reconstructed estimates of active infections, we implemented an event-based risk framework that quantifies the probability of encountering at least one infectious individual in gatherings of different sizes. This probability was subsequently translated into a four-level epidemiological traffic-light indicator and computed at both state and municipality levels. The resulting estimates revealed substantial spatial heterogeneity that is obscured by state-level aggregation, particularly in states with marked differences between urban and rural municipalities. To evaluate consistency with public-health indicators, we compared the proposed risk classification with the official Mexican epidemiological traffic-light system, considering interpretable gathering sizes relevant to public-health decision making. Weekly reports derived from this framework were delivered to policymakers in the State of Queretaro in Mexico, as an anticipation tool for school reopening and public-space management. This demonstrates that this Bayesian reconstruction of infections combined with event-based risk metrics can provide an interpretable and generalizable municipality-level complement to routine surveillance systems, particularly in regions with limited testing capacity and heterogeneous local transmission dynamics.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using mobile phone data to estimate dynamic population changes and improve the understanding of a pandemic: A case study in Andorra 96%
- COVID-19: Short term prediction model using daily incidence data 95%
- Data Driven High Resolution Modeling and Spatial Analyses of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracing contacts to evaluate the transmission of COVID-19 from highly exposed individuals in public transportation 95%
- Extended compartmental model for modeling COVID-19 epidemic in Slovenia 95%
- Can tracking mobility be used as a public health tool against COVID-19 following the expiration of stay-at-home mandates? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Are we there yet? An adaptive SIR model for continuous estimation of COVID-19 infection rate and reproduction number in the United States 95%
- Dynamics and Development of the COVID-19 Epidemics in the US: a Compartmental Model with Deep Learning Enhancement 90%
- Optimizing the Implementation of Clinical Predictive Models to Minimize National Costs: A Sepsis Case Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Predictive Modelling Framework for COVID-19 Transmission to Inform the Management of Mass Events 95%
- A Multivariate Forecasting Model for the COVID-19 Hospital Census Based on Local Infection Incidence 92%
- Estimation of the probability of reinfection with COVID-19 coronavirus by the SEIRUS model 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.