Reduced nighttime smartphone use among cohabiting partners: a longitudinal study under the lens of social control of health behaviors theory
Klasson, T. A.; Rod, N. H.; Zucco, A. G.
Show abstract
Objective: We examined the link between cohabitation with a partner and nighttime smartphone use through the social control of health behavior theory. Background: Nighttime smartphone use is a behavioral risk factor for sleep problems. While previous research has predominantly focused on individual-level risks of sleep disturbances, the role of social context remains underexplored. Theoretical frameworks, specifically the Social Control of Health Behavior, suggest that social relationships regulate health-related behaviors; however, it is unclear how far this regulation extends to modern digital behaviors among couples. Method: We analyzed survey data from three waves of the SmartSleep Study (2018, 2020, and 2023; total N = 25,028), including a longitudinal follow-up subset (N = 1,003). We tested multivariate associations between living with a partner, changes in cohabitation status and frequent nighttime smartphone use by fitting generalized linear mixed-effects models. Additionally, we mapped the complex interplay between indicators of social integration, social support, smartphone use, and sleep quality using hierarchical clustering of non-linear correlations. Results: Cohabiting participants had lower odds of frequent nighttime smartphone use compared to those living alone (OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.72). This lower risk was driven primarily by cohabitation with a partner (OR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.66). Longitudinal analysis supported these findings, showing that sustained cohabitation was associated with less frequent nighttime use (OR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.82). Clustering analysis revealed that indicators of social integration and support clustered with favorable sleep quality. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the health-protective effects of cohabitation with a partner extend to digital behaviors. Consistent with social control of health behavior theory, the presence of a partner appears to reduce frequent nighttime smartphone use, highlighting the critical importance of considering social context when addressing digital health hygiene and promoting sleep.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reliable Contactless Monitoring of Heart Rate, Breathing Rate and Breathing Disturbance During Sleep in Aging: A Digital Health Technology Evaluation Study 93%
- Comparison of accelerometry-based measures of physical activity 91%
- A Neural Network Based Algorithm for Dynamically Adjusting Activity Targets to Sustain Exercise Engagement Among People Using Activity Trackers 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A clinical trial to evaluate the dayzz smartphone app on employee sleep, health, and productivity at a large US employer 94%
- Are adversities and worries during the COVID-19 pandemic related to sleep quality? Longitudinal analyses of 48,000 UK adults 92%
- Behaviour-based movement cut-off points in 3-year old children comparing wrist- with hip-worn actigraphs MW8 and GT3X 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- How is the COVID-19 pandemic impacting our life, mental health, and well-being? Design and preliminary findings of the pan-Canadian longitudinal COHESION Study 93%
- Protocol for a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional cohort study to assess personal light exposure 92%
- Dose-response associations of device measured sleep regularity and duration with incident dementia in 82391 UK adults 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social networking service, patient-generated health data, and population health informatics: patterns and implications for using digital technologies to support mental health 93%
- Sleep in Frontline Healthcare Workers on Social Media During the COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
- Tracking private WhatsApp discourse about COVID-19: A longitudinal infodemiology study in Singapore 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.