Back

Ferritin across long-term conditions in England: cross-sectional primary care study

KATUMBA, A. M.; Drakesmith, C. W.; Haynes, S.; Maynard, S.; Maharajan, V.; Erone, I.; Smith, M.; Shah, A.; Roy, N.; Bankhead, C.; Stanworth, S. J.

2026-06-11 primary care research
10.64898/2026.06.06.26355042 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Iron deficiency (ID) is a readily treatable condition once identified. Ferritin is the primary diagnostic marker, but cut-offs vary and inflammation complicates interpretation in patients with long-term conditions (LTCs). Aim To describe ferritin distribution and the prevalence of threshold-defined low ferritin in adults with and without LTCs in primary care. Design and setting Cross-sectional observational study using routinely collected electronic health records from a national primary care database in England (1st January 2015 to 31st December 2021). Method Adults with >1 ferritin test in Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum were included. LTCs were identified using validated primary-care code lists. Outcomes included ferritin distribution and threshold-defined ID prevalence using World Health Organization (WHO) (<15 ug/L; <70 ug/L if inflammation) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (<30 ug/L) cut-offs, stratified by sex and, in women, by age <50 versus >=50 as a proxy for menopausal status. Results 4,489,594 individuals were included; 55% (n=2,469,882) had >1 LTC. Ferritin was lowest in women <50 and in LTCs characterised by impaired absorption or blood loss (coeliac disease, inflammatory bowel disease). Among women <50 with an LTC, 80% had ferritin <70 ug/L versus 47% <30 ug/L, leaving 33% in the 30 to 70 ug/L range potentially missed by standard cut-offs; equivalent figures were 28% in women >=50 and 17% in men. Conclusion Threshold-defined low ferritin is very common across LTCs and disproportionately affects women, particularly those under 50. Condition-specific, inflammation-adjusted ferritin thresholds may improve detection, management, and equity in primary care.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.4%
2
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
6
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.7%
8
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
9
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.3%
11
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
13
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
21
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
22
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
24
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
25
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
26
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
27
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%