Back

Ferritin across long-term conditions in England: cross-sectional primary care study

KATUMBA, A. M.; Drakesmith, C. W.; Haynes, S.; Maynard, S.; Maharajan, V.; Erone, I.; Smith, M.; Shah, A.; Roy, N.; Bankhead, C.; Stanworth, S. J.

2026-06-11 primary care research
10.64898/2026.06.06.26355042 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Iron deficiency (ID) is a readily treatable condition once identified. Ferritin is the primary diagnostic marker, but cut-offs vary and inflammation complicates interpretation in patients with long-term conditions (LTCs). Aim To describe ferritin distribution and the prevalence of threshold-defined low ferritin in adults with and without LTCs in primary care. Design and setting Cross-sectional observational study using routinely collected electronic health records from a national primary care database in England (1st January 2015 to 31st December 2021). Method Adults with >1 ferritin test in Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum were included. LTCs were identified using validated primary-care code lists. Outcomes included ferritin distribution and threshold-defined ID prevalence using World Health Organization (WHO) (<15 ug/L; <70 ug/L if inflammation) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (<30 ug/L) cut-offs, stratified by sex and, in women, by age <50 versus >=50 as a proxy for menopausal status. Results 4,489,594 individuals were included; 55% (n=2,469,882) had >1 LTC. Ferritin was lowest in women <50 and in LTCs characterised by impaired absorption or blood loss (coeliac disease, inflammatory bowel disease). Among women <50 with an LTC, 80% had ferritin <70 ug/L versus 47% <30 ug/L, leaving 33% in the 30 to 70 ug/L range potentially missed by standard cut-offs; equivalent figures were 28% in women >=50 and 17% in men. Conclusion Threshold-defined low ferritin is very common across LTCs and disproportionately affects women, particularly those under 50. Condition-specific, inflammation-adjusted ferritin thresholds may improve detection, management, and equity in primary care.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.