Back

Dementia and Frailty Impact Postoperative Care Trajectories and Burden among Older Adults Undergoing Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer

Ernandez, J.; Xiang, L.; Adler, R.; Hsu, J.; Shah, S. K.; Kim, D.; Gershman, B.; Mossanen, M.; Weissman, J. S.

2026-06-06 urology
10.64898/2026.06.04.26354768 medRxiv
Show abstract

OBJECTIVE: Bladder cancer (BC) is predominantly a disease of older, comorbid adults, and radical cystectomy (RC), which is the gold standard treatment, carries considerable morbidity. We sought to determine the impact of baseline dementia and frailty on the care trajectory beyond the immediate postoperative period. We hypothesized that frail patients and those with dementia undergoing RC for BC will have poorer care trajectories. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified Medicare beneficiaries [≥] 66 years old who underwent RC for BC in 2017 with 12 months of pre- and post-RC enrollment. Frailty and dementia were characterized using validated, claims-based measures. Associations between baseline frailty and dementia with postoperative care trajectory outcomes were determined using Fine-Gray competing risk models. RESULTS: We identified 3,600 beneficiaries of whom 11.6% were frail and 3.4% met criteria for dementia. Patients with dementia were more likely to be frail, comorbid, and not receive standard-of-care neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Frailty was independently associated with [≥] 2 transitions in care level after index discharge from RC and skilled nursing facility (SNF) admissions within 1 year of RC, exposure to intensive post-RC interventions, including dialysis and feeding tube placement, and poorer survival. Dementia remained associated with SNF admissions regardless of frailty level. CONCLUSIONS: Among a contemporary cohort of older adults undergoing RC for BC, preoperative dementia and frailty were independently associated with poorer care trajectory beyond the immediate postoperative period after RC. Our work highlights a role for preoperative geriatric assessment in identifying and optimizing patients at greatest risk.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
20.0%
2
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
5.2%
4
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
5
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.9%
7
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
8
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
11
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%