Efficacy of the PragmaVAC Manual Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Device to Treat Acute Traumatic Wounds in a Conflict Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study from Gaza
Ramadan, I.; Hariri, M.; Shalakhti, O.; Alawa, J.; Godier-Furnemont, A.; Traboulsi, A. A.-R.; MOWAFI, H.
Show abstract
Abstract: Background: Acute war-related traumatic wounds present significant challenges due to significant soft-tissue damage/loss, risk of contamination, limited access to antimicrobial therapy, need for delayed closure, and limited access to surgical and wound care. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) has been used effectively to reduce the volume of soft-tissue defects, edema, and infection in traumatic wounds, and to promote growth of healthy granulation tissue. However, conventional NPWT devices are costly and electricity-dependent, limiting their utility in conflict settings. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the use of PragmaVAC, a manually operated, electricity-independent NPWT device, in patients across three hospitals in Gaza with conflict-related wounds that were deemed by the treating surgeon to be unsuitable for primary closure. Secondary analysis was performed of clinical records of patients treated with the PragmaVac NPWT device to assess ability to achieve a primary outcome of wound bed with healthy granulation tissue, time to primary outcome, and rates of adverse effects. Secondary outcome of wound closure and closure method was also assessed. Results: Treatment with PragmaVAC manual NPWT was prescribed to 88 patients. Of those, 27 (31%) had incomplete documentation of their wound healing or were lost to follow up. The remaining 61 (69%) had complete documentation of their wound healing, complications, and final outcome with 59 (67%) successful closure and 2(2%) failure. Conclusion: The use of the PragmaVAC NPWT device provided a safe, effective wound care option to achieve wound closure for large conflict-related traumatic wounds in resource-limited settings. Future studies may further evaluate such use through prospective trials, evalutions of patients' experiences with manual NPWT, and evaluating outcomes beyond primary wound closure to include medium- and long-term complications, cosmesis, and cost of therapy.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.