Back

Estimating Infectious Disease Importation Risk during the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Herrera-Diestra, J. L.; Bi, K.; Ptak, S.; Ertem, Z.; Al-amery, A.; Harris, M.; Meyers, L. A.

2026-06-04 public and global health
10.64898/2026.06.03.26354828 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. The 2026 FIFA World Cup will bring an estimated 1--5~million international visitors to 11~US host cities between June~11 and July~19, 2026---the largest tournament in history. Large-scale international gatherings accelerate importation of infectious diseases from diverse source populations. Advance estimation of importation risk is essential for public health preparedness and surveillance prioritization. Methods. We developed a Poisson importation framework applied to five diseases (dengue fever, influenza, malaria, measles, and pertussis) across the 11~US venue cities. Three nested travel models of increasing resolution were constructed: a baseline model using routine June~2024 arrival data; a World Cup--adjusted model incorporating projected visitor growth factors; and a schedule-driven model routing WC fans to specific cities based on match assignments. WHO incidence and BTS T-100 routing fractions were combined with Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation (5,000 Uniform draws on under-reporting and travel-while-infectious parameters) to yield median importation estimates with 95\% uncertainty intervals. Results. Dengue posed the highest importation risk at most venue cities under the schedule-driven model (median $\Lambda > 10$ expected importations from Brazil alone; 95\% uncertainty interval 5.9--33.1), robust across the full literature-supported parameter range; Atlanta was the exception, where malaria probability exceeded dengue, driven by direct travel from West and Central African nations. Influenza ranked second at most cities, coinciding with the Southern Hemisphere winter peak. Pertussis showed broad geographic spread but carries the widest relative uncertainty, as the assumed detection rate sits at the upper bound of the literature range. Background tourism accounted for the dominant share of total importation risk; the World Cup fan increment contributed approximately 8.3\% of projected arrivals for WC-qualified nations. Conclusions. This Poisson importation framework, built entirely from publicly available data, provides reproducible importation risk estimates for mass gathering events. The framework extends to additional diseases, cities, and gatherings, offering a transparent baseline complementary to proprietary modeling systems.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
3
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
4
Journal of Travel Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
6
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.5%
9
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
13
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
15
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
16
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
23
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%