Back

Cardiovascular Outcomes with GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes or Obesity Undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Lum, J.; Jordan, A.; Knigh, P.; Hisamoto, K.

2026-06-04 surgery
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354773 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have demonstrated cardiovascular benefit in type 2 diabetes and obesity, with recent observational data suggesting favorable associations after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Whether similar associations exist after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is unknown. Methods: Retrospective propensity-matched cohort analysis using the TriNetX U.S. Collaborative Network. Adults with type 2 diabetes or obesity (BMI [≥]30 kg/m2) undergoing SAVR were categorized by GLP-1 RA exposure (any use within 3 months before through 1 year after SAVR) versus no use. One-to-one matching was performed on 44 covariates. Primary outcomes were 1-year all-cause mortality, heart failure, acute kidney injury, acute myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, and atrial fibrillation. Sensitivity analyses included 30-day landmark restriction and falsification outcomes. Results: After matching, 1,984 patients were retained per cohort. GLP-1 RA use was associated with lower 1-year risks of all-cause mortality (4.8% vs 10.4%; HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34-0.56), acute kidney injury (6.9% vs 10.1%; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.85), myocardial infarction (3.0% vs 5.1%; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, (0.40-0.82), heart failure (11.3% vs 15.7%; HR, 0.68; 95% CI, (0.51-0.90), and atrial fibrillation or flutter (10.1% vs 13.9%; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.90; all P[≤]006). Cerebral infarction did not differ. In landmark analysis, mortality, heart failure, and acute kidney injury associations persisted; myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation associations were attenuated. Falsification outcomes were null. Conclusions: Perioperative GLP-1 RA use was associated with lower 1-year cardiovascular event rates after SAVR. These hypothesis-generating findings support prospective randomized investigation.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.