Back

A prospective study of the METS-IR index to predict arrhythmia risk in middle-aged adults

Lu, Q.; Bi, W.; Cheng, Y.; Li, Y.; Tang, H.; Liu, L.-J.

2026-06-03 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.01.26354663 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Higher METS-IR has been shown to be associated with a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, but data are lacking regarding cardiac arrhythmias. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the association between METS-IR and atrial fibrillation/flutter, ventricular arrhythmia and bradyarrhythmia. Methods: Data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study spanning 1987 to 2013 was utilized for this analysis. METS-IR scores were assessed at baseline (1987-1989) and arrhythmia episodes were identified using ICD-9 codes. Multivariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to evaluate the relationship between METS-IR and arrhythmia risk, with dose-response analyses conducted. In addition, we analyzed the predictive value of METS-IR for arrhythmias. Results: Over a mean follow-up of 21.9 years, 2493 cases of AF, 688 cases of bradyarrhythmia, and 1315 cases of ventricular arrhythmia were recorded. Each interquartile range increase in METS-IR was associated with a 49% higher risk of atrial fibrillation(P<0.001), 29% higher risk of bradyarrhythmia(P<0.001), and 42% higher risk of ventricular arrhythmia(P<0.001). After correction for relevant confounders, the METS-IR index was significantly and positively associated with the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation, bradyarrhythmia, and ventricular arrhythmia (P overall<0.05, P for non-linearity>0.05). Most of the results of the subgroup analyses were not significantly different. The inclusion of METS-IR in the base model improves the predictive value of the risk of arrhythmogenesis. Conclusions: There is a significant association between METS-IR and increased risk of arrhythmias.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.