Border-Region Status and Diagnosed Diabetes Prevalence in Texas: A Cross-Sectional Ecological Analysis
Saha, P. R.; Khan, S.; Yahaya, Y.; Meia, M. A. A.
Show abstract
Diagnosed diabetes disproportionately burdens socioeconomically disadvantaged populations in the United States, particularly Hispanic communities in the Texas-Mexico border region. Few studies have quantified whether geographic border-region status is independently associated with county-level diagnosed diabetes prevalence after accounting for lifestyle and food-environment factors. This cross-sectional ecological study examined 253 Texas counties using CDC PLACES 2025 health estimates and USDA Food Environment Atlas food-access data, including the 2015 county-level low-food-access measure. Border-region counties were defined using the official La Paz Agreement 32-county definition, which includes counties within 100 km of the US-Mexico boundary. Multiple linear regression with HC3 robust standard errors was used to estimate associations between border-region status, low food access, physical inactivity, and diagnosed diabetes prevalence. Variance inflation factor analysis assessed multicollinearity, and Global Moran's I tested spatial autocorrelation in diagnosed diabetes prevalence and OLS residuals. Border-region counties had 33% higher unadjusted mean diagnosed diabetes prevalence than non-border counties (16.1% vs. 12.1%). After adjustment, border-region status remained significantly associated with a 0.625 percentage-point higher diagnosed diabetes prevalence ({beta} = 0.625, 95% CI [0.357, 0.893], p < 0.001). Physical inactivity was the strongest independent predictor ({beta} = 0.404, 95% CI [0.391, 0.417], p < 0.001). The model explained 96.0% of county-level variance (R{superscript 2} = 0.960, N = 253), reflecting ecological associations among modeled county-level health indicators. Global Moran's I confirmed strong spatial clustering of diagnosed diabetes prevalence (I = 0.5734, p = 0.001), with reduced but significant residual spatial autocorrelation after OLS adjustment (I = 0.1696, p = 0.001). These findings suggest that border-region status is associated with elevated diagnosed diabetes prevalence beyond physical inactivity and low food access, supporting targeted public health investment in the Texas-Mexico border region
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Native American Resilience to Protect Family Nutrition During a Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis 91%
- Evolving Patterns of COVID-19 Mortality in US Counties: A Longitudinal Study of Healthcare, Socioeconomic, and Vaccination Associations 91%
- The development and validation of a survey to measure fecal-oral child exposure to zoonotic enteropathogens: The FECEZ Enteropathogens Index 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Geographic Disparities and Determinants of COVID-19 Incidence Risk in the Greater St. Louis Area, Missouri 94%
- Estimating the dietary and health impact of implementing mandatory front-of-package nutrient disclosures in the US: a policy scenario modeling analysis 92%
- Effects of trust, risk perception, and health behavior on COVID-19 disease burden: Evidence from a multi-state US survey 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying communities at risk for COVID-19-related burden across 500 U.S. Cities and within New York City 89%
- Frailty increases the risk of adverse outcomes among 38,950 UK Biobank participants with prediabetes: A prospective cohort study 88%
- Estimating COVID-19 Hospitalizations in the United States with surveillance data using a Bayesian Hierarchical model 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Testing the phenotypic decanalization hypothesis: social determinants of hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes in adult urban Argentinian population 92%
- Can tracking mobility be used as a public health tool against COVID-19 following the expiration of stay-at-home mandates? 90%
- The contribution of aquatic foods to human nutrient intake and adequacy in a Small Island Developing State 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.