Back

Border-Region Status and Diagnosed Diabetes Prevalence in Texas: A Cross-Sectional Ecological Analysis

Saha, P. R.; Khan, S.; Yahaya, Y.; Meia, M. A. A.

2026-06-02 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.05.30.26354501 medRxiv
Show abstract

Diagnosed diabetes disproportionately burdens socioeconomically disadvantaged populations in the United States, particularly Hispanic communities in the Texas-Mexico border region. Few studies have quantified whether geographic border-region status is independently associated with county-level diagnosed diabetes prevalence after accounting for lifestyle and food-environment factors. This cross-sectional ecological study examined 253 Texas counties using CDC PLACES 2025 health estimates and USDA Food Environment Atlas food-access data, including the 2015 county-level low-food-access measure. Border-region counties were defined using the official La Paz Agreement 32-county definition, which includes counties within 100 km of the US-Mexico boundary. Multiple linear regression with HC3 robust standard errors was used to estimate associations between border-region status, low food access, physical inactivity, and diagnosed diabetes prevalence. Variance inflation factor analysis assessed multicollinearity, and Global Moran's I tested spatial autocorrelation in diagnosed diabetes prevalence and OLS residuals. Border-region counties had 33% higher unadjusted mean diagnosed diabetes prevalence than non-border counties (16.1% vs. 12.1%). After adjustment, border-region status remained significantly associated with a 0.625 percentage-point higher diagnosed diabetes prevalence ({beta} = 0.625, 95% CI [0.357, 0.893], p < 0.001). Physical inactivity was the strongest independent predictor ({beta} = 0.404, 95% CI [0.391, 0.417], p < 0.001). The model explained 96.0% of county-level variance (R{superscript 2} = 0.960, N = 253), reflecting ecological associations among modeled county-level health indicators. Global Moran's I confirmed strong spatial clustering of diagnosed diabetes prevalence (I = 0.5734, p = 0.001), with reduced but significant residual spatial autocorrelation after OLS adjustment (I = 0.1696, p = 0.001). These findings suggest that border-region status is associated with elevated diagnosed diabetes prevalence beyond physical inactivity and low food access, supporting targeted public health investment in the Texas-Mexico border region

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
18.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.2%
5
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
7
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
8
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
14
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
15
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
22
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%