Back

Tricuspid Valve Remodeling in a New Grading Scheme for Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Three-Dimensional Echocardiography Study

Xie, M.; Zhou, Y.; Li, H.; Xie, Y.; Yan, X.

2026-05-29 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.27.26354283 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: The specific 3D morphological substrates distinguishing the newly defined massive and torrential functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) phenotypes from standard severe disease remain under-characterized. Objectives: This study investigates the 3D geometric changes of the tricuspid valve (TV) apparatus across the spectrum of FTR, specifically focusing on the structural definition of massive and torrential grades. Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed in 322 patients with FTR secondary to left-sided heart disease. Patients were stratified into mild-moderate (n=166), severe (n=82), and massive-torrential (n=74) groups. TV geometry, including annular dimensions, leaflet tethering, and subvalvular apparatus, was quantified using 3D modeling software. Results: Patients with massive-torrential TR were characterized by advanced age, female predominance, and atrial fibrillation (75%). 3D analysis demonstrated that massive-torrential TR represents a distinct phenotype defined by extreme annular circularization (ellipticity index 1.0) and planar flattening (P < 0.001). Furthermore, these patients exhibited a critical leaflet-annulus uncoupling, where compensatory leaflet growth (relative length < 80%) failed to match the massive annular dilation. Consequently, the regurgitant orifice in massive-torrential grades appeared highly complex, frequently manifesting as multiple irregular orifices. Conclusions: Massive and torrential FTR are characterized by a unique geometric profile involving extreme annular circularization, severe leaflet tethering, and leaflet-annulus uncoupling. These morphological insights suggest that conventional repair strategies may be insufficient for these advanced phenotypes, highlighting the necessity for pre-procedural 3D TEE to guide device selection.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.0%
2
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.6%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
6
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
7
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
8
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
11
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
12
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
13
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
14
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
16
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
17
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
22
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
23
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%