Back

Tricuspid Valve Remodeling in a New Grading Scheme for Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Three-Dimensional Echocardiography Study

Xie, M.; Zhou, Y.; Li, H.; Xie, Y.; Yan, X.

2026-05-29 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.27.26354283 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: The specific 3D morphological substrates distinguishing the newly defined massive and torrential functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) phenotypes from standard severe disease remain under-characterized. Objectives: This study investigates the 3D geometric changes of the tricuspid valve (TV) apparatus across the spectrum of FTR, specifically focusing on the structural definition of massive and torrential grades. Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed in 322 patients with FTR secondary to left-sided heart disease. Patients were stratified into mild-moderate (n=166), severe (n=82), and massive-torrential (n=74) groups. TV geometry, including annular dimensions, leaflet tethering, and subvalvular apparatus, was quantified using 3D modeling software. Results: Patients with massive-torrential TR were characterized by advanced age, female predominance, and atrial fibrillation (75%). 3D analysis demonstrated that massive-torrential TR represents a distinct phenotype defined by extreme annular circularization (ellipticity index 1.0) and planar flattening (P < 0.001). Furthermore, these patients exhibited a critical leaflet-annulus uncoupling, where compensatory leaflet growth (relative length < 80%) failed to match the massive annular dilation. Consequently, the regurgitant orifice in massive-torrential grades appeared highly complex, frequently manifesting as multiple irregular orifices. Conclusions: Massive and torrential FTR are characterized by a unique geometric profile involving extreme annular circularization, severe leaflet tethering, and leaflet-annulus uncoupling. These morphological insights suggest that conventional repair strategies may be insufficient for these advanced phenotypes, highlighting the necessity for pre-procedural 3D TEE to guide device selection.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.5%
2
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.3%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
8.3%
5
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.5%
8
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
9
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
12
Rheumatology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
13
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
14
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
16
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
18
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
23
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.6%
24
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.5%
30
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%