Back

Twelve-Month Outcomes of Intrathecal Vesemnogene Lantuparvovec for Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Children Younger than 24 Months in Low- and Middle- Income Countries

Ngu, L. H.; Mo, Q.; Li, S.; Toh, T. H.; Lee, J. N.; Lim, K. C.; Tehuteru, E. S.; Lestari, R.; Sanguansermsri, C.; Abueita, H.; Gwer, S.; Li, L.; Wang, Z.; Kirmani, S.; Chen, J. X.; Cai, Y. Y.; Zheng, N. N.; Yang, S. Y.; Liang, P. J.; Li, Y.; Lu, M.; Tang, Y.; Li, Y.; Ye, J. Z.; Shi, S. J.; Hong, J. F.; Chen, A. Y.; Zheng, C. K.; Wang, S.; Lim, T.-O.; Lahn, B. T.; Gao, A. T.

2026-05-30 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.05.27.26354188 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a monogenic neuromuscular disease caused by mutations in the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene. Onasemnogene abeparvovec is a U.S. FDA-approved single-dose gene therapy for SMA. Both its intravenous formulation (Zolgensma, approximately USD 2.13 million per patient) and intrathecal formulation (Itvisma, around USD 2.59 million per patient) are prohibitively expensive, substantially limiting accessibility in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We conducted a clinical study of vesemnogene lantuparvovec, an alternative to onasemnogene abeparvovec developed for use in LMIC settings. Methods Sixteen patients with SMA, including 8 with type 1 SMA and 8 with type 2 SMA, received a single intrathecal administration of vesemnogene lantuparvovec. Eleven patients were treated with a low dose (1.5 * 10^14 vg) and five with a high dose (3.0 * 10^14 vg). The primary endpoints were safety and efficacy, assessed by changes from baseline in developmental gross motor milestones according to the World Health Organization criteria. Overall survival was primarily evaluated in type 1 SMA patients. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06288230. Results As of the March 2026 cutoff date, 15 of 16 treated patients had completed at least 12 months of follow-up after treatment, while the remaining one type 1 SMA patient died of disease progression at month 6 post-treatment. At 12 months post-treatment, among the surviving 7 patient with type 1 SMA, the median age was 21.6 months (range, 16.1 to 32.3 months). Among the 16 treated patients, the median age at diagnosis was 4.4 months (range, 0.0 to 18.0 months), and the median age at dosing was 10.7 months (range, 2.8 to 22.5 months). All patients experienced at least one AE. Thirty-one AESIs were reported in 13 patients, including hepatotoxicity, thrombocypenia-related events and cardiac events. No patient required prolonged prednisolone prophylaxis. SAEs, including pneumonia, lower respiratory tract infection, upper respiratory tract infection, and haemorrhagic diarrhoea, occurred in 5 of 8 (63%) patients with type 1 SMA and 2 of 8 (25%) patients with type 2 SMA. Two patients with type 1 SMA required invasive ventilation, and one of whom subsequently died. At 12 months post-treatment, 11 of 16 treated patients (69%) gained at least one new WHO motor milestone versus baseline, including 3 type 1 and 8 type 2 SMA patients; one type 2 patient gained six WHO motor milestones and achieved independent walking. Conclusions In patients younger than 24 months of age with type 1 or type 2 SMA, a single intrathecal dose of vesemnogene lantuparvovec was safe and generally well tolerated and was associated with improvements in developmental gross motor milestones compared with outcomes observed among referred but untreated patients. Additional studies are required to further evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of this gene therapy.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
2
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
3
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
7
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
10
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
11
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
15
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
17
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
20
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Rheumatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
29
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%