Back

Differential serum binding patterns predicting healthy subjects and cancer patients

Cavalluzzo, B.; Cambrola, B.; Mangano, S.; Belli, A.; Izzo, F.; D'Angelo, R.; Chiofali, M. G.; Forte, C. A.; Morabito, A.; Calabrese, A.; De Laurentiis, M.; Vanella, V.; Ascierto, P. A.; Picozzi, F.; Clemente, O.; Martucci, N.; Pavone, E.; Mercadante, E.; Ionna, F.; Lucarelli, M. C.; Mauriello, A.; Ragone, C.; Wang, L.; Ma, C.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, X. W.; Tagliamonte, M.; Buonaguro, L.

2026-05-29 immunology
10.64898/2026.05.26.727832 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A viral exposure signature (VES) has been previously described predicting the development of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in at-risk patients. This has been achieved by a serological profiling of the viral infection history using a synthetic human virome including >100k epitopes (VirScan). In the present study we applied the same VirScan strategy to identify a differential serum binding pattern (DSBP) for classifying patients of different cancer types from healthy individuals. In particular, the healthy group included both age-matched (ADULTS) as well as elderly (ELDERS) individuals, the latter counting also nonagenarians and centenarians. The class comparison performed with serological data show DSBPs supporting class predictions, as confirmed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Antibody responses supporting the class predictions are specific to peptides from persistent herpesviruses, acute-infecting viruses and, consistently in all comparisons, human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV). Strikingly, the DSB of the ELDERS vs. CANCER comparison is characterized by higher titers in the healthy subjects; on the contrary, the DSB of the ADULTS vs. CANCER comparison is characterized by lower titers in the healthy subjects. Overall, the results show a differential serological binding pattern predicting healthy individuals (ADULTS or ELDERS) from patients with different types of cancer. Such results provide the first evidence suggesting a close link between anti-microbial immunity and cancer development. They may be of the highest relevance in terms of predictive, diagnostic and/or prognostic impact in oncology.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.6%
4
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.0%
5
European Journal of Immunology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.7%
9
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
18
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
20
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
27
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Cell Death Discovery
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
RNA Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
30
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%