Back

Exploring healthcare experiences and access needs in unplanned hospital admissions for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A multi-perspective qualitative study

Hawkins, R. L.; Cotterill, C.; McCormick, S.; Kellar, I.; Lobo, A. J.; Sampson, F. C.

2026-05-27 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.05.26.26353596 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Unplanned hospital admissions in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) account for nearly three-quarters of IBD inpatient stays in the United Kingdom. Although costly to services and distressing for patients, research exploring experiences and potential drivers of admissions is limited. We undertook a qualitative study to explore the healthcare experiences and access needs of people with IBD who had unplanned admissions, along with their caregivers and clinicians. Methods Semi-structured interviews with 25 participants from a single tertiary IBD service in England (17 people with IBD, 3 informal caregivers, 5 clinicians) were conducted. We applied thematic framework analysis, guided by the Candidacy Framework, and worked with 2 patient and public contributors to generate final themes. Results We identified four themes: 1) Difficulties in Identifying flares and asserting severity before admission, summarised the prevailing uncertainty in identifying a flare and access to timely IBD care. 2) Navigating a disjointed healthcare system, highlighted how lack of care plans and systemic barriers can delay access. 2) Emergency care access challenges highlighted the gaps in emergency and inpatient care during flares. Whilst 4) fighting for care and individual advocacy needs, described the persistent assertion for care that may disproportionally impact access to vulnerable groups, also highlighting the importance of positive interpersonal relationships. Conclusions Individual, interpersonal and healthcare factors across the patient pathway were perceived to shape access to care in unplanned IBD admissions. Potentially reducing admissions requires proactive strategies, including the integration of patient education, monitoring tools, establishment of specialist rapid-access pathways, and formal psychological support to address barriers to access.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 1%
13.4%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.4%
3
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
4
Gut
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
American Journal of Gastroenterology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
6
Health Expectations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
10
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
15
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
20
BJPsych Open
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
21
BMJ Paediatrics Open
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Gastro Hep Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
British Journal of General Practice
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
BJGP Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
28
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.6%