Back

Random Forest Model for Predicting Post-Lockdown Antenatal Depression Risk: A Cross-Sectional Study of Pregnant Women in China

Pan, Y.; Lin, H.; HIRONO, T.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.

2026-05-26 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.23.26353929 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background As lockdown measures was eased, pregnant women faced an elevated risk of COVID-19 infection, potentially impacting their mental health. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of antenatal depression (AD) post-lockdown and develop predictive models for AD risk using machine learning. Methods A cross-sectional study utilizing the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was conducted in Beijing and Guizhou, China, from January to August 2023. Data was randomly split into training and test datasets (6:4 ratio), with logistic regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) models trained and compared. The best model underwent further examination, including SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for feature importance, calibration curve (CC) for discrimination, and decision curve analysis (DCA) for clinical benefit. Results The effective response rate was 91.07% (459/504), with 25.7% (118/459) testing positive for AD. Multivariate analysis identified "sleep disorders," "family support level," and "COVID-19 symptom severity" as independent predictors. RF model showed the highest area under the curve in both training (0.842) and testing (0.724) datasets, with SHAP emphasizing the greatest impact of "sleep disorders" on AD. The RF model's calibration (P > 0.05) and clinical utility across thresholds (8%-95% and 10%-58%) were confirmed by CC and DCA, respectively. Conclusions AD strongly correlated with "sleep disorders," "family support level," and "COVID-19 symptom severity" post-lockdown, and the EPDS-based RF model effectively predicted AD risk.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.8%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.9%
3
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
5
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.7%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.6%
7
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
9
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
10
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.5%
13
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
14
Systematic Reviews
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.0%
21
Journal of Public Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Journal of Global Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
25
Public Health
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Journal of Psychiatric Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
29
Pharmaceuticals
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%