Back

No evidence of cognitive or psychological impact after returning research Alzheimer disease biomarkers: A delayed-start, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial

Hartz, S. M.; Jackson, S.; Benzinger, T. L. S.; Bierut, L. J.; Evans, A.; Goswami, S.; Gordon, B. A.; Hassenstaab, J.; Hayibor, L. A.; Linnenbringer, E.; Morris, J. C.; Moulder, K.; Oliver, A.; Sun, L.; Schindler, S. E.; Xiong, C.; Mozersky, J.

2026-06-01 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.22.26353881 medRxiv
Show abstract

Importance: Little is known about the impact of returning Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarkers to cognitively unimpaired (CU) research participants. Objective: Does return of research results (RoRR) negatively impact longitudinal symptoms of depression and cognition. Design: Randomized, noninferiority, delayed-start clinical trial, 2021-2025 Setting: AD biomarker research results offered to CU participants in a longitudinal study of aging Participants: CU participants age 65+ were offered research AD biomarker results (APOE genotype and either plasma AB42/40 or amyloid PET and MRI hippocampal volume) with an estimated 5-year risk of symptomatic AD. Intervention(s) (for clinical trials) or Exposure(s) (for observational studies): 147 participants were randomized to receive results either soon after consent (RoRR arm, N=73) or one year later (delayed-start arm, N=74). Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): Longitudinal change in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes (CDR-SB), and global cognitive composite. Outcomes were measured at annual assessments for a longitudinal study of aging. Results: 187 participants received results: 70 in RoRR arm (average age 75, 60% female), 66 in delayed-start arm (average age 73, 53% female). The observed changes in annual measures did not differ between arms in both those with elevated amyloid (AB+) and in those without elevated amyloid (AB-) for GDS (AB+ difference 0.7, 95% CI 0.0-1.3; AB- difference -0.1, 95% CI -0.7-0.5; clinically significant decline >4.0), CDR-SB (AB+ difference 0.0, 95% CI -0.1-0.1; AB difference 0.0, 95% CI 0.0-0.1; clinically significant decline >0.5), and cognitive composite (AB+ difference -0.10, 95% CI -0.25-0.06; AB- difference -0.05, 95% CI -0.17-0.07; clinically significant decline < -0.26). Secondary analyses found no evidence of association between RoRR and proximity to follow-up testing. Conclusions and Relevance: In the first randomized, delayed-start clinical trial of returning AD research results to CU older-adult participants, no effect was seen on longitudinal changes in symptoms of depression or cognition. This supports evidence that there are no harms to returning AD research results, although the results may not apply to more diverse populations not included in this study. Trial Registration: NCT04699786

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.9%
2
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
5
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.7%
7
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
8
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
9
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
11
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
12
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
13
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
15
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
17
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Aging
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
19
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
20
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%