Intention of UK residents to wear facemasks and practise social distancing during the next respiratory virus pandemic
Smith, D. R.; Buckell, J.; Hancock, T. O.; Morrell, L.; Pouwels, K.
Show abstract
Background: Wearing facemasks and practising social distancing slow the spread of respiratory pathogens. However, in the event of a new pandemic emerging, the willingness of populations to voluntarily adopt these behaviours is unclear. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was conducted among 2,006 UK-based adults. Participants were presented with hypothetical scenarios describing the emergence of a respiratory virus pandemic and were asked to choose when they would wear facemasks and practise social distancing. A mixed multinomial logit model was used to jointly estimate how disease severity and prevalence, uncertainty in these quantities, and individual-level characteristics influence behavioural choices. Findings: Participants were averse to facemasks and social distancing in the absence of pandemic risk. For each ten-unit increase in severity (10 additional hospitalisations/1,000 infections), the odds of always wearing a facemask outside the home increased by 15.9% (95%CI: 14.3%, 17.5%), relative to rarely/never, and the odds of avoiding all people as much as possible increased by 16.4% (14.6%, 18.2%), relative to not avoiding anyone. Greater disease prevalence, uncertainty in disease severity or disease prevalence, a university education, prior COVID-19 vaccination and non-white ethnicity were also associated with choosing to always wear facemasks and avoid all people as much as possible. The probability of participants choosing to rarely/never wear facemasks varied from 13.4% (11.9%, 14.9%) in the lowest-risk scenario to 1.4% (1.2%, 1.7%) in the highest-risk scenario. Interpretation: Perceived risks of disease and associated uncertainty drive intention of UK adults to adapt their behaviour in a future pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Does pre-infection stress increase the risk of long COVID? Longitudinal associations between adversity worries and experiences in the month prior to COVID-19 infection and the development of long COVID and specific long COVID symptoms 92%
- The influence of COVID-19 risk perception and vaccination status on the number of social contacts across Europe: insights from the CoMix study 91%
- Time trends in social contacts before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONNECT study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 92%
- COVID-19 collateral: Indirect acute effects of the pandemic on physical and mental health in the UK 92%
- Predicting hospital-onset COVID-19 infections using dynamic networks of patient contacts: an observational study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in England during April to September 2020: Results from the ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey 94%
- Detecting COVID-19 infection hotspots in England using large-scale self-reported data from a mobile application: a prospective, observational study 93%
- Quarantine and testing strategies in contact tracing for SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of compliance with COVID-19 preventive behaviours: a latent class analysis of 20,000 UK adults 94%
- Deprivation and Exposure to Public Activities during the COVID-19 Pandemic in England and Wales 93%
- Do people reduce compliance with COVID-19 guidelines following vaccination? A longitudinal analysis of matched UK adults 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Time varying association between deprivation, ethnicity and SARS-CoV-2 infections in England: a space-time study 93%
- The Omicron SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in England during February 2022 93%
- Predictors of uncertainty and unwillingness to receive the COVID-19 booster vaccine: an observational study of 22,139 fully vaccinated adults in the UK 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.