Back

Using Bayesian Evidence Synthesis to estimate the number of sex workers in the United Kingdom

Long, H.; Gada, L.; Murray, L.; Laurence, T.; Hayward, A.; Finnie, T.

2026-05-26 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.21.26353767 medRxiv
Show abstract

Sex work is diverse and includes a broad range of people and settings. Over the last thirty years, a large proportion of public health emergencies of international concern (PHEIC) have involved infections transmitted through sexual or close contact and in sexual networks (WHO 2024). Sex workers can face increased disadvantage in relation to these public health emergencies. Given the significant health inequalities sex workers can face, they should be eligible to receive targeted and tailored health support to reduce health protection risks (Hester 2019; Jeal and Salisbury 2004a). However, they are often not explicitly eligible for targeted and tailored support due to a lack of information on incidence, prevalence of disease, and even more basic data such as reliable estimates of the number of sex workers in the UK. Accordingly, the aim of this paper is to determine a population size estimate, with uncertainty, that is more robust than those currently available. In this study, we apply Bayesian Evidence Synthesis to bring together historic estimation efforts with recent ONS National Population Estimates and Genito-Urinary Medicine Clinics Attendance Data (GUMCAD) from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). A key feature of our model is the embedding of uncertainty from each input study in model priors, hence propagating it through to our final estimate. The Bayesian evidence synthesis model estimated a total of 84,000 sex workers in the United Kingdom (95% credible interval: 49,000-130,000), representing 0.121% of the current UK population.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.4%
5
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.7%
8
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
10
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
12
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
17
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
20
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
22
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
24
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
26
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%