Back

Improving bystander automated external defibrillation application in Singapore: An 11-year population-based living-laboratory study

Bokman, J. T.; Singapore PAROS Investigators, ; Ee, S.; Fook-Chong, S. M. C.; Binte Ahmad, N. S.; Leong, B. S.; Chia, M. Y. C.; Okada, Y.; Ong, M. E. H.; Siddiqui, F. J.

2026-05-22 emergency medicine
10.64898/2026.05.20.26353744 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Bystander automated external defibrillator (BAED) use improves out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes but remains uncommon globally. This study evaluated the outcomes of Singapore's 11-year public-access AED expansion and volunteer-responder implementation in terms of trends in BAED use, associated factors, and clinical outcomes. Methods This population-based, retrospective cohort study used Singapore Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (SG-PAROS) data (2010-2020) for adult, non-traumatic OHCAs. The primary outcome was bystander AED application. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with use. Secondary outcomes included favorable neurological status (CPC 1-2), survival to discharge, and prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Results Of 21,439 included OHCA cases (median age 70.0 years; 63.8% male), BAED use increased from 1.7% to 9.6% over 11 years, with a corresponding increase in overall survival from 2.4 to 4.0%. Malay ethnicity (aOR 1.25, 1.06-1.49), calendar year (aOR 1.26, 1.22-1.29), and delayed emergency medical services (aOR 1.24, 1.06-1.45) were positive predictors of BAED use. Conversely, BAED use was lower among females (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.94), at night (aOR 0.69, 0.56-0.86), and in residential settings (aOR 0.06, 0.05-0.07). Volunteer arrival strongly increased application (aOR 4.16, 3.41-5.09), with a significant interaction (p<0.001); the effect was greater in residential (aOR 7.38, 5.81-9.38) than non-residential settings (aOR 1.71, 1.22-2.40). AED use predicted favorable neurological outcome (aOR 2.80, 2.24-3.50; NNT 8.7), survival (aOR 2.30, 1.89-2.80), and ROSC (aOR 2.11, 1.81-2.46). Conclusion Over 11 years, we saw a significant increase in BAED application and favorable neurological survival. This success was associated with the implementation of an integrated strategy combining widespread AED deployment, national training, and smartphone-activated volunteer responders. Singapore's experience provides a scalable model for urban centers seeking to expand their AED strategy.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
19.9%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
5
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.8%
8
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
9
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
11
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
21
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
22
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
23
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%