Back

Optical coherence tomography as a biomarker for frontotemporal dementia: a systematic review & meta-analysis

Wang, E.; Kohli, A.; Taha, H. B.

2026-05-27 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.19.26353366 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) lacks widely accessible disease-specific biomarkers. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) may provide non-invasive measures of retinal changes associated with neurodegeneration. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating retinal biomarkers in FTD compared with Alzheimer disease (AD) and controls. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was conducted through April 25, 2026 according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating OCT/OCTA biomarkers in FTD with comparator groups were included. Inverse weighted random-effects models, publication bias assessments, and meta-regressions were performed. Results: Ten studies involving 139 individuals with FTD, 87 with AD, 29 with mild cognitive impairment, 14 with TDP-43 proteinopathy, 5 with tauopathy, and 255 controls were included in the systematic review; five studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Compared with AD, individuals with FTD demonstrated significantly thinner retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness (SMD = -0.61, 95% CI -0.98, -0.24). Compared with controls, individuals with FTD exhibited significantly thinner ganglion cell layer-inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL) thickness (SMD = -0.55, 95% CI -1.02, -0.08), whereas pooled analyses across multiple retinal biomarkers were non-significant (SMD = -0.19, 95% CI -0.52, 0.14). RNFL thickness correlated negatively with female % in FTD and positively with age in both AD and controls. Conclusions: Individuals with FTD exhibit lower RNFL thickness than AD and lower GCL-IPL thickness than controls, suggesting retinal alterations may reflect neurodegeneration. However, larger longitudinal studies with standardized OCT/OCTA protocols are needed to determine the diagnostic and prognostic utility of retinal biomarkers in FTD

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.5%
2
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
17.3%
3
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
4
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
6
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
7
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
8
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
9
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
11
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
15
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
16
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
19
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%