Back

Brief Report-Combination Capmatinib and Trametinib in Metastatic MET-driven Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Brown, T. S.; Lara, M. S.; Jiang, F.; Garon, E. B.; Goldman, J. W.; Riess, J. W.; Blakely, C. M.

2026-05-21 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.19.26353265 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Introduction: MET tyrosine kinase (TKI) therapy has improved outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring MET alterations. However, primary and acquired resistance ultimately limits durability of response. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the MET inhibitor capmatinib with the MEK inhibitor trametinib in patients with metastatic MET-driven NSCLC who had progressed on prior treatment with at least one MET inhibitor. Methods: A multicenter phase I study evaluated capmatinib in combination with trametinib in patients with advanced stage NSCLC harboring activating MET alterations and prior exposure to at least one MET TKI. A 3+3 dose-escalation design was employed to assess safety and tolerability of the combination. Results: Three patients (n = 3) were enrolled in the study and completed a median of 3 cycles of therapy. Dose-limiting toxicities, including rash, edema, and nausea, necessitated dose reductions in the first two patients and initiation of the third patient at a lower dose level. Ultimately, all patients discontinued therapy due to treatment-related adverse events. The study was terminated early due to poor accrual and TRAEs. No radiographic objective responses were observed. Conclusions: In this phase I trial, capmatinib plus trametinib was associated with significant treatment-related adverse events and treatment was discontinued in all participants. Based on these findings, further investigation of this combination of MET and MEK inhibitors is not recommended.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.7%
2
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.1%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.1%
4
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
6
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
9
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
12
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
13
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
19
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
20
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
21
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
22
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
23
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
25
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
26
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
28
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%