Back

AI-Discovered Cognitive Models Reveal Novel Insights into Human and Animal Learning

Kasenberg, D.; Castro, P. S.; Eckstein, M. K.; Elteto, N.; Dabney, W.; Wang, C. L.; Engelcke, M.; Mohanta, R.; Dev, A.; Botvinick, M. M.; Tomasev, N.; Turner, G. C.; Costa, V. D.; Daw, N. D.; Stachenfeld, K. L.; Miller, K. J.

2026-05-21 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.05.18.725921 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Scientific models are widely used across the natural sciences as an interface between scientific theories and empirical data [1]. Such models play a key role, for example, in the study of human and animal learning, where they express algorithmic hypotheses and relate them to psychology and neuroscience data [2, 3]. These models are traditionally handcrafted by expert researchers based on existing theory or new insights. Such handcrafted models, however, are now known to fall short of capturing the full richness of behavior, even in their narrow domains [4-7]. An alternative data-driven approach has emerged, seeking to discover new insights by fitting and interpreting flexible models [8-11]. However, these tools require substantial human effort to derive insight from data, and it has been unclear how to discover new ideas from data efficiently. Here, we present DataDIVER, a general approach for automatically discovering computational models from data, and demonstrate that these models surface novel mechanistic insights into human and animal learning. Our approach delivers models that take the form of short computer programs, which are optimized both to fit data well and to be simple. These programs explicitly connect with existing theoretical frameworks and are readily understandable by human scientists. They can also be used to make novel predictions, some of which we show are borne out in re-analysis of existing data. General-purpose tools for surfacing new ideas from data, especially in combination with the large datasets that are increasingly available in many fields, stand to dramatically accelerate scientific discovery.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.9%
2
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
5
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.8%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
12
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
13
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
15
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
18
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
19
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
27
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%