Top 50 Cited Articles on Pediatric Respiratory Infections: A Web of Science Bibliometric Analysis
Albakri, S. A.; Almasoudi, G. S.; Albakri, D. A.; Aljariry, J. F.; Aljohny, L. B.; Rizg, L. N.; Alzahrani, L. M.; Albadi, E. A.; Alsubaie, L. A.; Alyoubi, W. B.; Alnajjar, A.
Show abstract
Abstract Background: Pediatric respiratory infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, representing a major health challenge in children. Research Gap: Despite extensive studies on epidemiology, clinical management, and specific pathogens, no bibliometric analysis has systematically evaluated the most influential research in this field. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of the top 50 most-cited articles on pediatric respiratory infections and to identify emerging research trends. Methods: The Web of Science database was searched without publication year restrictions. Independent reviewers screened studies based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted using a standardized form, including study details. Results: The 50 most-cited articles ranged from 34 to 384 citations and showed a right-skewed distribution with a sharp drop after the top ten. Publication years ranged from 1978 to 2021, with over half published in the 2010s. Articles appeared in 31 journals, with Pediatrics contributing five. Leading countries were the United States (18%), China (12%), and Canada (10%), with research largely concentrated in high-income regions and limited multicenter collaboration. Cohort studies dominated (66%), while randomized trials (12%) and reviews/meta-analyses (16%) were less common. Research clustered around three themes: clinical outcomes (e.g., pneumonia, bronchiolitis); viral etiology/diagnostics (e.g., RSV, SARS-CoV-2); and antimicrobial stewardship. Conclusion: Over the past decades, pediatric respiratory infection research has developed but remains unbalanced, relying heavily on observational evidence from high-income countries, with limited randomized trials, systematic reviews, multicenter collaborations, and LMIC-led studies. These findings provide insights that may direct researchers to identify potential focal points and guide future research in the field.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 95%
- Prevalence and outcomes of co-infection and super-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 95%
- Prevalence of Bacterial Coinfection and Patterns of Antibiotics Prescribing in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic review and Meta-Analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Availability, scope, and quality of monkeypox clinical management guidelines globally: a systematic review 93%
- Use of Interviewer-Administered Telephone Surveys during Infectious Disease Outbreaks, Epidemics, and Pandemics: A Scoping Review 93%
- Characterising long term Covid-19: a living systematic review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical pneumonia in the hospitalised child in Malawi in the post-pneumococcal conjugate vaccine era: a prospective hospital-based observational study 94%
- Effectiveness of amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults and children: systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Towards definitions of critical illness and critical care using concept analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical hypoxemia score for outpatient child pneumonia care lacking pulse oximetry in Africa and South Asia 92%
- Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes carried by young children and their association with Acute Otitis Media during the period 2016 - 2019. 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance and viral load kinetics in young children (1-6 years) compared to adults: Results of a longitudinal study in Germany 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.