Back

Automated identification of bolus types in modified barium swallow studies using deep learning: a preliminary study

Mao, S.; Sahli, A. J.; Buoy, S. N.; Hutcheson, C.; Gelabert, G. A.; Barbon, C. E. A.; Naser, M. A.; Fuller, C. D.; Brock, K. K.; Hutcheson, K. A.

2026-05-20 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.16.26353385 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) studies utilize videofluoroscopy, a dynamic X-ray technique for evaluating swallowing anatomy and physiology. Each MBS exam typically includes multiple bolus trials, often involving different bolus consistencies. Accurate classification of bolus types is essential, as swallowing dynamics, aspiration risks, and residue levels vary with bolus consistency. In this preliminary study, we propose a deep learning-based approach for automated bolus type classification in MBS, aiming to provide a standardized and efficient framework for automated processing of swallowing assessments. Methods: A total of 206 patients (Mean +/- SD age: 60.24 +/- 9.02 years; 89.32% men) underwent MBS examinations, comprising 277 individual MBS studies. The dataset included 2,752 bolus-level video segments, categorized by bolus type as follows: 1,711 liquid (IDDSI 0-3, 62.17%), 521 pudding (IDDSI 4, 18.93%), and 520 solid boluses (IDDSI 7, cookie or cracker, 18.89%). To standardize variable video lengths for the data pipeline, each MBS video was temporally segmented into a fixed-length frame sequence, with shorter videos padded using static frames and longer videos randomly cropped to the target length. We employed an Inflated 3D convolutional neural network to develop the deep learning model. Results: Each video segment contained an average of 273.03 +/- 195.81 frames. On the independent test set, the deep learning model achieved an overall accuracy of 96.13%, and the macro F1-score was 95.05% in classifying food bolus types within MBS videos. Conclusions: The developed AI-based system demonstrated effective automated classification of food bolus types in MBS videos, representing an important step toward fully automated MBS analysis for swallowing efficiency assessment. The AI model reduces the reliance on manual labels, thereby promising to streamline clinical and research workflows.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.4%
2
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.4%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
6
Children
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
Annals of Translational Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
12
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
15
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.4%
18
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
19
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
22
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
24
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
25
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
27
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
28
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%