Back

Neuroprotection following FLASH-RT may be mediated by sustained glutamate receptor AMPAR activation in CA3 neurons

Kunz, L. V.; Almeida, A.; Knol, M.; Petit, B.; Kramar, E. A.; Wood, M. A.; Limoli, C.; Marie-catherine, V.

2026-05-19 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.05.15.725423 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To elucidate the early mechanisms underlying the long-term neuroprotective effect of FLASH-RT in the normal brain, spatial transcriptomics (Nanostring) were performed after whole-brain irradiation of C57BL/6J mice with either 1 or 3 fractions of 10 Gy at 5.6x106 Gy/s (1 pulse-FLASH) or at conventional dose-rate 0.1 Gy/s. FLASH -RT induced a distinct transcriptomic signature in the CA3 and DG neurons, with upregulation of genes encoding glutamate receptors, involved in calcium signaling, long-term potentiation and mitochondrial OXPHOS. Early transcriptional upregulation of Gria gene translated into increased AMPAR protein levels at 48h in the DG and CA3 region and sustained higher AMPAR expression at 2 and 4 weeks post-FLASH. These findings support a durable activation of AMPAR. We propose a mechanism to explain FLASH-induced neuroprotection initiated by early calcium influx and subsequent sustained expression of glutamate receptor AMPAR in neurons and/or neural progenitors of the CA3, potentially contributing to long-term cognitive sparing. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/725423v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (59K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ae125forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@138357aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13f128dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1db1cf6_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HighlightsO_LIFLASH-RT induces a stronger transcriptional response in the hippocampus than the cortex. C_LIO_LIFLASH-RT induces calcium signaling, LTP and mitochondrial OXPHOS genes. C_LIO_LIEarly AMPAR upregulation leads to sustained protein expression. C_LIO_LIFLASH-RT induces a AMPAR-dependent signaling program in CA3 neurons. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.4%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.0%
3
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
4
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 9%
5.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.8%
9
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
18
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.3%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
24
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
25
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
26
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
27
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.8%
29
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%