Back

Population nuclear mitochondrial disease risk estimated from nuclear disease gene variants in a healthy older cohort

Watson, E. C.; Ravishankar, S.; Hobbs, M.; Copty, J.; Yu, C.; Kummerfeld, S.; Liang, C.; Lacaze, P.; Davis, R.; Sue, C. M.

2026-05-18 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.14.26353160 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mitochondrial diseases (MDs) are genetically and phenotypically diverse and can be difficult to diagnose. Prevalence estimates derive largely from diagnosed cases and may underestimate population MD risk. Population-based studies are limited in scope and number but indicate MD variants are common. As genomic sequencing advances have made comprehensive population-based evaluation feasible, we sought to evaluate nuclear MD variation in a population cohort to understand variant prevalence and differences in MD risk estimates We identified disease-associated nuclear gene variants in 270 nuclear MD genes across 2,845 healthy older individuals in the Medical Genome Reference Bank. From Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic Variants (PLPVs) we estimated autosomal recessive (AR) and autosomal dominant (AD) MD risk for individual genes and all nuclear variant-associated MDs. We identified 554 PLPV alleles representing 357 unique variants in 145 genes. Combined AR MD risk was estimated at 25.8 per 100,000 (95% CI 18.7 to 32.9), or 1 in 3,880 individuals. SPG7 (12.65 per 100,000; 95% CI 7.52-20.6) and POLG (4.23 per 100,000; 95% CI 2.10-8.01) contributed the greatest single gene AR MD risks and OPA1 variants posed the greatest AD MD risk. We observed a high rate of MD-associated nuclear gene variation in this healthy older cohort. The estimated lifetime AR MD risk was higher than commonly quoted prevalence estimates for all MDs, and the presence of common AD variants suggests variant penetrance may be lower than previously understood. These data help contextualise population MD risk and may inform clinical counselling and care.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
Neurobiology of Aging
107 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
4
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
5
Human Molecular Genetics
141 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.3%
6
Nature Aging
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
9
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
14
Molecular Neurodegeneration
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
15
Genetics in Medicine
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
18
Neurology Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
47 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
24
Mitochondrion
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
25
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.0%
26
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
27
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Movement Disorders
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%