Back

Population nuclear mitochondrial disease risk estimated from nuclear disease gene variants in a healthy older cohort

Watson, E. C.; Ravishankar, S.; Hobbs, M.; Copty, J.; Yu, C.; Kummerfeld, S.; Liang, C.; Lacaze, P.; Davis, R.; Sue, C. M.

2026-05-18 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.14.26353160 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mitochondrial diseases (MDs) are genetically and phenotypically diverse and can be difficult to diagnose. Prevalence estimates derive largely from diagnosed cases and may underestimate population MD risk. Population-based studies are limited in scope and number but indicate MD variants are common. As genomic sequencing advances have made comprehensive population-based evaluation feasible, we sought to evaluate nuclear MD variation in a population cohort to understand variant prevalence and differences in MD risk estimates We identified disease-associated nuclear gene variants in 270 nuclear MD genes across 2,845 healthy older individuals in the Medical Genome Reference Bank. From Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic Variants (PLPVs) we estimated autosomal recessive (AR) and autosomal dominant (AD) MD risk for individual genes and all nuclear variant-associated MDs. We identified 554 PLPV alleles representing 357 unique variants in 145 genes. Combined AR MD risk was estimated at 25.8 per 100,000 (95% CI 18.7 to 32.9), or 1 in 3,880 individuals. SPG7 (12.65 per 100,000; 95% CI 7.52-20.6) and POLG (4.23 per 100,000; 95% CI 2.10-8.01) contributed the greatest single gene AR MD risks and OPA1 variants posed the greatest AD MD risk. We observed a high rate of MD-associated nuclear gene variation in this healthy older cohort. The estimated lifetime AR MD risk was higher than commonly quoted prevalence estimates for all MDs, and the presence of common AD variants suggests variant penetrance may be lower than previously understood. These data help contextualise population MD risk and may inform clinical counselling and care.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.3%
3
Mitochondrion
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
5
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
6
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Aging
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
13
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
15
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
17
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
23
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
30
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%