Back

Can glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists be beneficial for brain health?

Ballabio, G.; Mason, A. C.; Paz, V.; Dale, C.; Sofat, R.; Garfield, V.

2026-05-17 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.13.26353120 medRxiv
Show abstract

SUMMARY Background GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely used for treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity and have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits, but their effect on dementia risk is uncertain. We used a drug-target Mendelian randomisation (MR) framework to estimate the causal effect of GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonism on dementia risk and brain structure. Methods We used single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in GLP1R to recapitulate the effect of GLP1-RAs against circulating markers of glucose, glycated haemoglobin and outcomes of type 2 diabetes and obesity, to understand if we can reliably proxy agonism at GLP1R using gene variants. We then considered clinical outcomes, including all-cause dementia, vascular dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and neuroimaging outcomes. Analyses were conducted in UK Biobank and replicated in FinnGen and All of Us and results were combined using meta-analysis. Findings Genetically proxied GLP-1R agonism was associated with a 17% lower risk of vascular dementia, with directional consistency across the two largest cohorts. No consistent association was observed for all-cause dementia. An elevated risk of Alzheimer's disease was observed in UK Biobank but was not replicated in FinnGen or All of Us, and the pooled estimate across cohorts was null. There was no consistent evidence of an effect on neuroimaging outcomes, though higher GLP-1R agonism was associated with greater total brain volume. Interpretation Genetic evidence supports a potential protective effect of GLP-1R agonism on vascular dementia, consistent with the established cardio-metabolic benefits of this drug class. The null pooled finding for Alzheimer's disease suggests that GLP-1R agonism does not meaningfully modify neurodegenerative pathways specific to this disease, though results from ongoing clinical trials are awaited. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between dementia subtypes when evaluating the cognitive effects of cardiometabolic therapies.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
18.0%
2
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
3
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
4
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
5
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
6
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
7
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
8
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.6%
9
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
10
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
14
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
20
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
22
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
24
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
26
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
29
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%