Comparative Risk of Stroke Associated with GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors in Veterans with Type 2 Diabetes
Sun, S. C.; Houghton, S. C.; Li, Y.; Nguyen, X.-M.; Djousse, L.; Cho, K.; Aparicio, H. J.; Wilson, P. W. F.
Show abstract
Introduction Stroke is a leading cause of disability and death in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We evaluated the comparative stroke risk in Veterans with T2D initiated on either of two glucose-lowering medications: GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) or SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Patients and Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study on diabetic Veterans aged 40 and older with no prior history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, who started on a GLP-1RA or SGLT2i between 2014 and 2021. Patients with contraindications or prior exposure to medication were excluded. Using national Veteran health data, we identified 195,072 [SS1.1]eligible individuals and followed them from treatment initiation until stroke, death, loss to follow up, or end of follow up, whichever came first. Primary outcome was incident stroke, and secondary outcomes included ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. We applied Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models. Adjusted associations were estimated using inverse probability weighting. Results Both unadjusted and adjusted analyses suggest GLP-1RA users have reduced stroke incidence compared SGLT-2i users[HS2.1] (HR = 0.[HS3.1]67, 95% CI 0.64-0.69; HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.69-0.75). Similar results were found in secondary outcome and stratified analyses, with GLP-1RA users having reduced stroke risk compared to SGLT2i users for all age groups, chronic kidney disease stages, and hemoglobin A1c levels. Discussion and Conclusion GLP-1RA treatment was associated with a lower risk of stroke compared with SGLT2i treatment in Veterans with T2D. These findings were consistent for ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes, suggesting potential differences in stroke risk between the treatments.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Persistent Inequities in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the U.S.: Results from the NIS 95%
- Long-term Outcomes of Peripheral Artery Disease In Veterans: Analysis of the PEripheral ARtery Disease Long-term Survival Study (PEARLS) 94%
- Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Blood Pressure Control From 2011 To 2019 In Patients 90 Days After Stroke 96%
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 94%
- Improvement in Delivery of Ischemic Stroke Treatments but Stagnation of Clinical Outcomes in Young Adults in South Korea 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of Cardiovascular Events after Covid-19: a double-cohort study 93%
- Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel: the Impact of Platelet Inhibition on Cerebrovascular Microembolic Events during TAVR 93%
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants Affect Activated Clotting Time During and Bleeding Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lipid profiles in ST-elevation myocardial infarction with and without diabetes: the gap between prescription and targets 94%
- Temporal Variations in Ischemic and Bleeding Event Risks after Acute Coronary Syndrome during Dual Antiplatelet Therapy 93%
- Utility of the CHADS-P 2 A 2 RC score for estimating net adverse clinical events in chronic coronary syndrome patients without atrial fibrillation: insights from the CLIDAS-PCI 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vascular Risk Factor Prevalence and Trends in Native Americans With Ischemic Stroke - A National Inpatient Sample Analysis 96%
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 94%
- Impact of Fludrocortisone on the Outcomes of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Retrospective Analysis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.