Back

Comparative Risk of Stroke Associated with GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors in Veterans with Type 2 Diabetes

Sun, S. C.; Houghton, S. C.; Li, Y.; Nguyen, X.-M.; Djousse, L.; Cho, K.; Aparicio, H. J.; Wilson, P. W. F.

2026-05-17 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.13.26353028 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction Stroke is a leading cause of disability and death in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We evaluated the comparative stroke risk in Veterans with T2D initiated on either of two glucose-lowering medications: GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) or SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Patients and Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study on diabetic Veterans aged 40 and older with no prior history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, who started on a GLP-1RA or SGLT2i between 2014 and 2021. Patients with contraindications or prior exposure to medication were excluded. Using national Veteran health data, we identified 195,072 [SS1.1]eligible individuals and followed them from treatment initiation until stroke, death, loss to follow up, or end of follow up, whichever came first. Primary outcome was incident stroke, and secondary outcomes included ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. We applied Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models. Adjusted associations were estimated using inverse probability weighting. Results Both unadjusted and adjusted analyses suggest GLP-1RA users have reduced stroke incidence compared SGLT-2i users[HS2.1] (HR = 0.[HS3.1]67, 95% CI 0.64-0.69; HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.69-0.75). Similar results were found in secondary outcome and stratified analyses, with GLP-1RA users having reduced stroke risk compared to SGLT2i users for all age groups, chronic kidney disease stages, and hemoglobin A1c levels. Discussion and Conclusion GLP-1RA treatment was associated with a lower risk of stroke compared with SGLT2i treatment in Veterans with T2D. These findings were consistent for ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes, suggesting potential differences in stroke risk between the treatments.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.4%
2
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
5
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
6
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
11
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
13
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
15
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
16
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
17
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
18
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
19
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
20
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
23
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
25
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
26
European Journal of Pharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%