Back

Proteomic profiling of cytoskeletal interactomes using MT-ID and Act-ID.

Neiswender, H.; Pride, J.; Veeranan-Karmegam, R.; Allen, P.; Henderson, J.; Lowe, M. E.; Vitriol, E. A.; Bollinger, K. E.; Gonsalvez, G. B.

2026-05-14 cell biology
10.64898/2026.05.12.724647 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The microtubule and actin cytoskeletons form dynamic, interconnected networks that are critical for eukaryotic cell function. These networks govern intracellular organization, cargo transport, cell migration, and tissue morphogenesis. Microtubules and actin filaments are regulated by diverse binding proteins that control many aspects of their function. However, identifying cytoskeletal-interacting proteins has been challenging due to the transient and weak nature of many interactions and the disruption of native architecture by conventional biochemical approaches. These limitations suggest that numerous physiologically relevant cytoskeletal regulators remain undiscovered. Identifying these factors requires novel and sensitive methodologies that can capture cytoskeletal interactions under native cellular conditions. Here, we present MT-ID and Act-ID, powerful proximity-labeling tools for identifying microtubule and actin-interacting proteins, respectively. MT-ID employs the microtubule-binding domain of MAP7 (EMTB) fused to TurboID, a highly active promiscuous biotin ligase. Act-ID utilizes the actin-binding domain of ITPKA (F-tractin) similarly fused to TurboID. We validate both approaches by successfully identifying numerous known cytoskeletal regulators and discovering potentially novel interacting proteins. Functional characterization reveals that LIMCH1 is a previously unrecognized microtubule-associated protein whose depletion increases microtubule density. Additionally, we identify FBXO30 as a novel actin-interacting protein, with its loss promoting increased focal adhesion formation. MT-ID and Act-ID will be useful not only to identify cytoskeletal interacting proteins but also to define changes to the cytoskeletal interactome when cells are exposed to changing physiological conditions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.1%
2
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
5
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
6
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
7
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
8
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.5%
9
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
11
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
Cytoskeleton
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
13
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
14
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
15
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
18
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.6%
19
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
20
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
21
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
24
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%