Cell line-dependent effects of spheroid formation method on drug response in melanoma models

In this study, we evaluated the impact of different in vitro 3D culture modelling methods on the activity of doxorubicin (DOX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in human melanoma spheroids. Human melanoma A375 and IGR39 spheroids were generated using the hanging drop and non-adhesive surface methods. Spheroid growth dynamics were assessed by measuring changes in spheroid diameter. To compare the effects of anticancer drugs in spheroids of different sizes, spheroids of approximately 200 and 400 {micro}m were formed. Drug activity was evaluated based on spheroid growth and cell viability using the MTT assay. A375 spheroids formed using the non-adhesive surface method were more sensitive to DOX than spheroids formed using the hanging drop method. In smaller A375 spheroids, 10 {micro}M 5-FU reduced cell viability more effectively in spheroids formed using the hanging drop method. In contrast, IGR39 spheroids formed by the hanging drop method were more resistant than those formed on a non-adhesive surface. However, in IGR39 spheroids, the effects of DOX and 5-FU on growth and viability did not significantly differ between formation methods. In conclusion, A375 spheroid growth was not significantly influenced by the formation method, whereas IGR39 spheroid growth depended on the method used. A375 spheroids formed on non-adhesive surfaces were more sensitive to DOX, whereas 5-FU activity depended on drug concentration and spheroid size. In IGR39 spheroids, the effects of DOX and 5-FU on growth and viability were largely independent of the spheroid formation method. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the researchers should carefully select the spheroid formation method for their studies, as this may influence the results of the tested compounds effect on their size and viability.