Back

Quantifying and identifying strategies to improve rotavirus vaccine impact in low- and middle-income countries

Asare, E. O.; Kwon, J.; Li, X.; Al-Mamun, M. A.; Lartey, B. L.; Jere, K. C.; Cunliffe, N. A.; Armah, G. E.; Lopman, B.; Pitzer, V. E.

2026-05-15 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.05.12.26353059 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Robust quantitative evidence on the impact of rotavirus vaccines, their potential benefits in countries without vaccination, and strategies to improve performance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is essential for informing policy decisions aimed at sustaining and expanding vaccination programs. Methods and Findings We used an age-structured compartmental model of rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) transmission that accounts for the natural history of infection to estimate vaccine impact across 112 LMICs. The model incorporates country-specific data on demographics, transmission dynamics, vaccination schedules, coverage levels, and vaccine performance. We simulated multiple scenarios, including the continuation of current vaccination programs, vaccine introduction in countries without programs, the addition of a third dose, scale-up of coverage to 95% in low-coverage settings, and suspension of vaccination. We quantified health impacts by estimating cases, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted from 2006 to 2024 and projected over 2025 to 2034 using either no vaccination or the current program as counterfactual. We estimated that rotavirus vaccination averted a median of 268 million RVGE cases (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 228-306 million), 35 million moderate-to-severe cases (95% UI: 30-38 million), 817 thousand deaths (95% UI: 684-928 thousand), and 53 million DALYs (95% UI: 45-61 million) between 2006 and 2024, resulting from 81 countries with vaccination programs out of 112 LMICs. Using the current vaccination as a baseline, we estimated substantial additional benefits for all strategies, except for suspension, which would increase the RVGE burden over the next 10 years. Scaling up coverage to at least 95% across all 112 LMICs, with countries without the vaccine using the 6/10/14-week schedule, could avert a median of 296 million RVGE cases (95% UI: 243-358 million), 832 thousand deaths (95% UI: 694-932 thousand), and 55 million DALYs (95% UI: 45-61 million), respectively. Furthermore, adding a third dose in the 51 countries currently using a two-dose schedule could enhance vaccine impact, averting a median of 123 million RVGE cases (95% UI: 102-145 million), 377 thousand deaths (95% UI: 310-440 thousand), and 24 million DALYs (95% UI: 20-28 million), respectively, compared to the two-dose schedule. Conclusions Our model demonstrates that rotavirus vaccination provides substantial health benefits, with an even greater impact achievable through broader adoption and increased coverage. Adding a third dose to the standard two-dose Rotarix schedule could be an additional strategy to improve vaccine impact in LMICs. These findings support continued efforts to sustain and expand vaccination programs across LMICs. The country-specific, model-estimated rotavirus burden can also inform economic evaluations to guide more effective vaccination strategies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.1%
2
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
4
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
8
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
11
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
15
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.5%
16
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
25
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
28
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%