Back

Artificial intelligence-generated digital Romberg test for peripheral neuropathy monitoring.

Tejada-Illa, C.; Pi-Cervera, A.; Pegueroles, J.; Claramunt-Molet, M.; Heras-Delgado, A.; Gascon-Fontal, J.; Idelsohn-Zielonka, S.; Rico, M.; Vidal-Fernandez, N.; Martin-Aguilar, L.; Caballero-Avila, M.; Lleixa, C.; Collet-Vidiella, R.; Moreno, J.; Mederer-Fernandez, T.; Llanso, L.; Carbayo, A.; Vesperinas, A.; Querol, L.; Pascual-Goni, E.

2026-05-15 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.12.26353015 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Objectives Patients with peripheral neuropathies (PN) commonly exhibit balance impairment. In clinical practice, balance is typically assessed using the Rombergs test and ataxia scales, which rely on examiner interpretation, while objective biomarkers for quantifying balance remain lacking. Wearable sensors are valuable tools for objectively quantifying gait abnormalities in PN patients and may capture clinically meaningful changes over time. By integrating these parameters, artificial intelligence (AI) can assist in generating a digital score that enables easy, objective, and reproducible monitoring of patients postural balance. This study aims to generate and assess an AI-generated digital Rombergs test to quantify balance impairments in a cohort of PN patients. Methods PN patients were assessed in a longitudinal study using a wearable system composed of inertial sensors placed on the trunk and plantar pressure sensors integrated in insoles. Patients performed the Rombergs test under both eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions and were classified according to ataxia severity (mild, moderate, or severe) following the score obtained in item 1 of MICARS and SARA scales. Results We included 97 patients with PN (including autoimmune and hereditary polyneuropathies), and 117 healthy controls (HC). Significant differences in trunk sway and center of pressure (COP) were observed between groups, particularly with eyes closed. Using wearable sensor parameters, we developed an AI digital Rombergs test, which correlated with clinician-rated Rombergs test performance and distinguished patients with and without ataxia (AUC=0.632) and across different PN pathologies. Longitudinally, digital Rombergs test and iRODS showed concordant trajectories. Also, changes [≥]25% in the score were associated with clinical changes in ataxia severity measured by an increase in MICARS-SARA score (+1.42 points), whereas improvement was associated with a decrease (-0.20 points) in the scale. Discussion This study demonstrates that wearable sensors are useful to detect and quantify balance impairment. The AI-generated Rombergs test is an objective and reproducible tool for postural balance assessment, with robust discriminatory performance across clinical ataxia severity in PN. Scores longitudinal changes aligned with clinical severity, supporting its potential for monitoring disease progression and treatment response. Its strong association with balance measures reinforces its role as a quantitative biomarker of postural control in ataxia patients.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.3%
2
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
3
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
7
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
9
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
11
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
16
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
24
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%