Learning Effects from A GenAI-based Clinical Decision Support System in Primary Healthcare
Mateen, B.; Williams, G.; Korom, R.; Mwaniki, P.; Emmanual-Fabula, M.; Agweyu, A.
Show abstract
To characterise the potential learning effects from a GenAI-based clinical decision support tool (CDST), we examined clinician behaviour within a cluster-randomised trial. The tool, AI Consult, parsed clinician notes written (in real-time) to document patient encounters and would raise green, yellow, or red flags to indicate no, potential, or critical risks of harm (respectively) in decisions the clinician made. Over several months, clinicians with access to the AI Consult tool produced fewer red (Intervention: 14% reduction, p = 0.032 vs. Control: 6% increase, p = 0.383) and yellow flags (Intervention: 6.8% reduction, p = 0.005 vs. Control: 3% increase, p = 0.231), whereas those without access to the tool showed no such effect. If this type of learning effect is a consistent emergent property across CDSTs, there might be an opportunity to reimagine their purpose: from addressing gaps in care quality to instead being a health system-strengthening investment.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 92%
- Patterns of rates of mortality in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 92%
- Protocol For Human Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Clinical Consultations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 93%
- Development and validation of a modified Cambridge Multimorbidity Score for use with internationally recognized electronic health record clinical terms (SNOMED CT) 91%
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The performance of national COVID-19 ‘Symptom Checkers’: A comparative case simulation study 92%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 92%
- Cracking the Code: A Scoping Review to Unite Disciplines in Tackling Legal Issues in Health Artificial Intelligence 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote Covid Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) risk prediction tool: derivation and real-world validation studies 92%
- Automated and partially-automated contact tracing: a rapid systematic review to inform the control of COVID-19 91%
- Real-world evaluation of AI-driven COVID-19 triage for emergency admissions: External validation & operational assessment of lab-free and high-throughput screening solutions 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.