Transcranial direct current stimulation-augmented cognitive training for post-COVID-19 cognition: A phase IIb randomized controlled trial
Trujillo Llano, C.; Fromm, A. E.; Lingemann, L.; Grittner, U.; Meinzer, M. F.; Fleischmann, R.; Brakemeier, E.-L.; Antonenko, D. F.; Floeel, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundCognitive dysfunction is a prevalent and debilitating symptom of post-COVID-19 condition with limited evidence-based interventions. Here, we assessed the efficacy of cognitive training (CT) alone and combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for cognitive enhancement in post-COVID-19 patients. MethodsNeuromod-COV was a phase IIb, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial conducted at University Medicine Greifswald, Germany. The tDCS intervention was evaluated through a double-blind, sham-controlled design. Adults aged 18-60 with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection [≥] 6 weeks prior and post-infection cognitive complaints were eligible. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to CT with active tDCS (CT+AtDCS), CT with sham tDCS (CT+StDCS), or progressive muscle relaxation (PMR, non-cognitive control intervention) with sham tDCS. Intervention consisted of nine 20-minute sessions over three weeks of CT (letter updating task) or PMR with 2 mA tDCS (active/sham) applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The primary outcome was untrained working memory (WM; measured by N-back task accuracy) comparing CT with PMR at post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included trained and untrained WM, visuospatial memory, and self-report measures at post-intervention and 1-month follow-up comparing CT vs. PMR and CT+AtDCS vs. CT+StDCS. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04944147). ResultsBetween October 1, 2021, and August 7, 2024, 60 participants were randomized (76.7% female) to CT+AtDCS (n = 20), CT+StDCS (n = 20), or PMR (n = 20). CT did not improve untrained WM at post-intervention compared with PMR (primary outcome: {beta} = 1.59, 95% CI - 1.30 to 4.48, p = 0.278; 1-back: {beta} = 2.52, 95% CI -1.27 to 6.31, p = 0.191; 2-back: {beta} = 0.66, 95% CI -3.12 to 4.44, p = 0.732). However, CT+AtDCS enhanced untrained WM at post-intervention and follow-up, and visuospatial memory at post-intervention compared with CT+StDCS (secondary outcomes). No intervention improved self-report outcomes. No serious adverse events occurred and incidence rate ratios were similar between groups. ConclusionCT alone did not improve untrained WM performance. However, CT with tDCS enhanced untrained WM and visuospatial memory, suggesting potential benefits of combined neuromodulation approaches for cognitive enhancement in post-COVID-19 patients.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Human Applications of Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation: A Systematic Review 95%
- Differential effects of theta-gamma tACS on motor skill acquisition in young individuals and stroke survivors: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study 94%
- Timing is everything: event-related transcranial direct current stimulation improves motor adaptation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility of Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Cognitive Remediation: A Systematic Review 94%
- Failure to modulate reward prediction errors in declarative learning with theta (6 Hz) frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation. 93%
- Protocol for Cerebellar Stimulation for Aphasia Rehabilitation (CeSAR): A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of dance movement interventions on psychological health in older adults without dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Dissociating Language and Thought in Human Reasoning 92%
- Targeting fronto-limbic dysfunctions via intermittent theta burst stimulation as a novel treatment for Functional Movement Disorders 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Remote Digital Memory Composite to Detect Cognitive Impairment in Memory Clinic Samples in Unsupervised Settings using Mobile Devices 91%
- The Physiologic Response to COVID-19 Vaccination 90%
- Exploring the Feasibility of Using Real-World Data from a Large Clinical Data Research Network to Simulate Clinical Trials of Alzheimer’s Disease 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.