Factors affecting trainees' preferred timing of clinical clerkships during M.D.-Ph.D. training

M.D.-Ph.D. programs in the United States have traditionally followed a "2-n-2" curricular model, with the graduate phase occurring between the pre-clerkship and clerkship portions of medical training. While well established, this format can limit trainee autonomy in shaping their physician-scientist training trajectories. In response, some programs have introduced a "3-n-1" model, allowing students to complete clerkships before beginning Ph.D. training. Our institution implemented multiple flexible curricula in 2017. Understanding why trainees choose one pathway is important as programs consider implementing more adaptable training structures. To investigate these factors, we surveyed M.D.-Ph.D. students at our institution, which offers multiple flexible curricular alternatives, about contributions to their curricular decisions. Responses supported that trainees weigh considerations across medical education, scientific development, and integrated physician-scientist training domains. Although the traditional pathway was a popular option, most students pursued one of the flexible pathways. Our findings suggest that introducing flexibility in the timing of undergraduate medical education and graduate training can support diverse educational, logistical, and personal priorities while maintaining the rigor of physician-scientist training. Offering multiple pathways empowers trainees to design trajectories that best fit their needs. Continued longitudinal studies are needed to assess the long-term impacts of flexible curricula on physician-scientist career outcomes.