Efficacy and Safety of Povidone Iodine versus Bleomycin for Pleurodesis in Malignant Pleural Effusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) frequently complicates advanced cancer and impairs quality of life. Chemical pleurodesis with agents such as bleomycin or povidone iodine is widely used, but comparative efficacy and safety remain uncertain. Bleomycin is an established agent but is costly and less available, whereas povidone iodine is affordable and easily accessible. This study aimed to systematically compare the efficacy and safety of bleomycin versus povidone iodine for pleurodesis in patients with malignant pleural effusions. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and the Google Scholar were searched through May 20th 2025. Studies included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing bleomycin and povidone iodine for pleurodesis in patients with MPE. Seven studies with 392 patients (174 in the povidone iodine group, 218 in the bleomycin group) were included. Success rates for pleurodesis ranged from 71.1% to 100% for povidone iodine and 66.7% to 95.2% for bleomycin. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in efficacy (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.94-1.15, p = 0.50; I2 = 43%). Both agents were well tolerated, with similar rates of mild adverse events. This study showed no significant bias. Povidone iodine and bleomycin are equally effective and safe for pleurodesis in MPE. Given its lower cost and greater accessibility, povidone iodine may be preferred, especially in resource-limited settings.