Back

Efficacy evaluation of glasedgib Sonic Hedgehog pathway inhibition with or without inotuzumab in B-ALL cells using a new co-culturing system model and a validated chemosensitivity assay

Woolston, D. W.; Churchill, M.; Grandori, C.; Advani, A.; Yeung, C. C. S.

2026-05-12 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.05.07.723573 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeGlasdegib is a Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) pathway inhibitor used for treating newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in elders or patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. This study sought to demonstrate growth inhibition and increased apoptosis of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) in vitro under glasdegib, alone and combined with inotuzumab, using a novel co-culture system and validated chemosensitivity testing model to determine whether glasdegib with and without inotuzumab may represent a promising treatment strategy in B-ALL. MethodsSeven blood and marrow samples from B-ALL patients were co-cultured with HS-5 stromal cells in a co-culturing system designed to mimic the tumor microenvironment to maintain B-ALL cell viability for chemosensitivity testing under glasdegib and inotuzumab. ResultsCo-culturing improved B-ALL viability from four to nine days. Dosage-dependent responses to glasdegib were consistent among B-ALL samples on day four based on culture viability, and varied based on expressions of SSH genes GLI1, GLI3, SMO, and PTCH1. Combination with inotuzumab had varied effects on treatment response. ConclusionCo-culturing B-ALL cells with HS-5 stromal cells improves B-ALL growth and viability. Glasdegib with and without inotuzumab treatments impact the viability of co-cultured B-ALL cells by day four. SHH gene expressions suggest different B-ALL patients may be sensitive or resistant to glasdegib and inotuzumab.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
29.6%
2
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.6%
3
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.1%
4
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
5
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
7
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Molecular Biology Reports
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
11
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
12
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
13
Experimental Hematology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
14
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.4%
16
Oncogenesis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
17
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
18
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%