Back

A 56-Day Single-Arm Exploratory Study of NatureU Mind Care BeautyU Caps on Crow's-Feet Wrinkle Count, Skin Hydration, and Related Skin-Aging Parameters in Adult Women

Law, L.; Luo, L.; Zhang, N.

2026-05-07 nutrition
10.64898/2026.05.07.26351904 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSkin aging is multifactorial, and finished multi-ingredient oral beauty supplements require dedicated clinical evaluation because their effects cannot be inferred from individual ingredient data alone. ObjectiveTo explore, in a 56-day single-arm open-label study, whether daily oral intake of NatureU(R) Mind Care BeautyU Caps is associated with within-participant changes in crows-feet wrinkle count (primary endpoint), stratum corneum hydration (secondary endpoint), and additional exploratory skin-aging parameters in adult women. MethodsA single-center, open-label, single-arm exploratory study enrolled 33 healthy women aged 36-56 years; 31 completed the protocol and were included in the completer efficacy analysis. Participants took one capsule orally once daily for 56 consecutive days. Assessments were performed at D0, D28 and D56 using PRIMOS CR, Corneometer CM 825, Cutometer MPA580, Glossymeter, Colorimeter CL400, Mexameter MX18, VISIA CR, DermaScan and a structured self-assessment. ResultsPRIMOS CR crows-feet wrinkle count fell from 965 {+/-} 334 at D0 to 514 {+/-} 171 at D56 (within-participant change -46.74%; nominal P = 0.001). Corneometer hydration rose from 44.3 {+/-} 7.8 to 70.3 {+/-} 9.9 (+58.69%; nominal P = 0.001). Exploratory parameters (other wrinkle metrics, elasticity, gloss, ITA{degrees}, melanin, spots, dermal thickness/density) generally moved in directions consistent with the primary signal. No adverse reactions were reported. ConclusionIn this open-label, single-arm exploratory study, daily NatureU(R) Mind Care BeautyU Caps was associated with within-participant reductions in crows-feet wrinkle count and increases in stratum corneum hydration over 56 days. Findings are hypothesis-generating; randomized placebo-controlled trials are required.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.8%
2
npj Aging
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
4
Food & Function
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
5
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.9%
7
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
9
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
10
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
11
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
12
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Nutrition
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
16
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.1%
19
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
23
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%