Illusory path configurations reveal age-related differences in egocentric pointing variability

A consistent finding across studies with older adults is that they typically perform worse at spatial memory tasks, particularly those conducted in virtual reality and involving novel environments, compared to young adults. While the underlying reasons for this difference remain unclear, some proposed hypotheses include differences in sensory cue integration and cue conflict resolution. Here, we tested older (n = 29) and young adults (n = 28) in immersive and walkable virtual reality using both correctly rendered and illusory hallways to test how visual cues (i.e., an intersection) and self-motion cues are integrated. In the illusory or false-intersection condition, we hypothesized that participants who walked an uncrossed path would merge two disconnected intersections, creating the illusion of a crossed path. The overall accuracy and pointing patterns were similar between young and older adults in both true- and false-intersection conditions. We did find, however, a significant age by condition interaction effect in egocentric pointing variability where older adults showed lower variability in the illusory condition and higher variability in the control condition. At the same time, older adults also drew worse maps for the control condition compared to young adults. However, the pointing error correlated with the accuracy of maps drawn regardless of age, suggesting that the pointing patterns shown by both age groups related to their underlying representations of the paths. Our findings are inconsistent with a global deficit in allocentric navigation or path integration and instead suggest that more subtle differences in strategy use might manifest with age.