Back

A Cardiac Contouring Atlas of the Left Ventricle Myocardial Walls on CT

Wei, J.; Abdollahi, A.; Knoll, M.; Furkel, J.

2026-05-07 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.06.26352374 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and purposePrecise manual annotation of the left ventricular myocardial (LVM) wall is essential for cardiac substructure research, wall-specific radiation dosimetry, and segmentation model development. However, existing radiotherapy-oriented atlases and conventional CT viewing planes lack an explicit framework for reproducible, wall-level LVM delineation. To address this gap, we developed an anatomy-guided manual segmentation protocol for delineating the five LVM walls on non-contrast-enhanced CT (NECT) or contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans. Materials and methodsThis protocol was developed using 60 chest CT scans from two prospective cohorts at Heidelberg University Hospital, including 50 CECTs from IMRT-MC2 cohort and 10 NECTs from MAGELLAN cohort. Manual contouring was performed in 3D Slicer. Segmentation rules were established through review by a radiation oncologist and a cardiology expert, based on the American Heart Association 17-segment model, and were tested on additional CT scans before final protocol definition. ResultsThe protocol centers on three geometric steps: (1) defining the LV long axis using the endocardial apex and the center of the mitral annulus; (2) constructing an apical delimitation plane based on LV geometry; and (3) partitioning wall regions via intersections of the right ventricular and LV cavity centers in the short-axis view. This workflow enables structured segmentation of the anterior, septal, lateral, inferior, and apical LVM walls, supporting anatomically coherent 3D reconstruction. ConclusionThis study provides contouring steps and a representative atlas as a methodological basis for standardized annotation, with potential applications in dose-mapping cardiotoxicity analysis and deep-learning modeling for radiotherapy.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.